you still think the sun is an ongoing nuclear reactor, radiating out energy/photon to every where.
the energy/photon vanishes into space.
totally wrong.
energy is moving/vibrating electrostatic force carried by moving/vibrating matter.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59686777 the energy/photon vanishes into space.
totally wrong.
energy is moving/vibrating electrostatic force carried by moving/vibrating matter.
preciously. and it called either the Electromagnetic Wave,
or the Photon,
depending on which side of the bed you wake up on.
what is aether? property? compound? mechanism?
imaginary?
The sun is not shooting out light/em wave/photon/energy to every direction, it only shares its vibration em force with matters surround. the energy/force strength is proportional to sun's temperature and mass, inversely proportional to distance squared.
The sun's energy is from star formation, not from on going nuclear reaction.
The sun will never cool off a bit without other huge mass come closer.
To understand all this, must understand atom structure first.
for those believe our sun is a nuclear reactor, ask yourself few questions.
why does all the nuclear fuel not ignite at once?
how nuclear reaction produces heat/energy?
how the energy reaches earth?
if the sun has radiated out energy for 5 billion years, where is all that energy?
what is energy? moving force produced by moving mass?
without matter, there is no energy, no force, nothing. no us, no thought.
matter is made from charged particles.
opposite charged particles attract each other, they collide like magnet and iron ball. the impact force/energy becomes heat/thermal energy of the atoms.
the more atoms get together by gravity attraction, the more mass is added, the higher thermal energy density, the higher temperature.
so bigger star carries more energy, produces stronger light.
the energy is stored in vibrating atoms/charged particles.
the energy a star carry is the vibrating gravity and electrostatic force in its total mass/charges.
the sun's energy is from star formation, the sun is not an active nuclear reactor.
the energy cannot vanish into space but share with other matters surround according to their distance.
the sun's energy circling around earth as earth spins.
if energy can never leak/vanish into space, why all the fuels we used did not make earth warmer?
if you cut a channel between the ocean and a lake, the water level will be the same. if rained 1 foot into the lake, the water level will be still the same. the force between matters is the channel.
if rained 1 inch in the ocean, the lake will be flooded by i inch.
the sun's energy/vibrating electrostatic force/radiation stays within the upper atmosphere and moves around the earth.
transforming into smatter's movement, wind, clouds, waves,
photosynthesis and more.
we cannot create energy, all we can do is to use energy stored in fuels, in sunlight, and in moving matters.
forget about free energy, zero point energy, vacuum energy, magnetic energy generator.
solar, wind, tide, hydro are clean, renewable. low tech.
just $, cut space and war $, can we green the earth?
old news from fuckedscience.com
Wednesday, July 12, 2017
nasa faked moon landing, some shadows are right under the object, means they made the video at noon time, which is not morning time as they said/should.
nasa, china, japan all fake news about solar sails work in space, photons able to transfer momentum to solar sail to accelerate spaceship.
they lied right in front your eyes.
if light/photon has momentum, why is laser beam cannot bend a flame? why is light mill not moving in a hard vacuum?
all space missions are fake, cuz they faked the time delay for space radio transmission.
light/em waves travel in vacuum space at an infinite speed, only within mediums at a limited speed.
so any communication takes more than 1/100 second is faked.
all scientists think light speed is c in the vacuum, they all wrong.
if light speed is limited in vacuum space, all stars, galaxies we see are from the past, how we map the universe and measure the total mass?
it is all bs, all lies.
there is no solar wind. what mechanism? why protons and electrons on the way to earth do not attract each other and form into hydrogen atoms? why does gravity not pull them back into the sun?
van allan belts? what's mechanism? the sun's energy/radiation/light strength decay at 1/rr, the only way to find stronger radiation is to get closer.
near around earth, radiation strength is the same, within the atmosphere, it decreases.
so between earth and the moon, the radiation strength is about the same, less within our atmosphere.
em drive? powered by quantum vacuum virtual plasma. it is voodoo science.
ligo detected gravity wave? you wave hand will produce more detectable gravity wave than far away stars explode.
gravity wave speed is infinite, gravity has to be instantaneous, otherwise, no planets can stay in orbit.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59686777 Wednesday, July 12, 2017
nasa faked moon landing, some shadows are right under the object, means they made the video at noon time, which is not morning time as they said/should.
nasa, china, japan all fake news about solar sails work in space, photons able to transfer momentum to solar sail to accelerate spaceship.
they lied right in front your eyes.
if light/photon has momentum, why is laser beam cannot bend a flame? why is light mill not moving in a hard vacuum?
all space missions are fake, cuz they faked the time delay for space radio transmission.
light/em waves travel in vacuum space at an infinite speed, only within mediums at a limited speed.
so any communication takes more than 1/100 second is faked.
all scientists think light speed is c in the vacuum, they all wrong.
if light speed is limited in vacuum space, all stars, galaxies we see are from the past, how we map the universe and measure the total mass?
it is all bs, all lies.
there is no solar wind. what mechanism? why protons and electrons on the way to earth do not attract each other and form into hydrogen atoms? why does gravity not pull them back into the sun?
van allan belts? what's mechanism? the sun's energy/radiation/light strength decay at 1/rr, the only way to find stronger radiation is to get closer.
near around earth, radiation strength is the same, within the atmosphere, it decreases.
so between earth and the moon, the radiation strength is about the same, less within our atmosphere.
em drive? powered by quantum vacuum virtual plasma. it is voodoo science.
ligo detected gravity wave? you wave hand will produce more detectable gravity wave than far away stars explode.
gravity wave speed is infinite, gravity has to be instantaneous, otherwise, no planets can stay in orbit.
from cnn
hopefully, soon all this will be common knowledge.
When you are dead, you do not know you are dead. It's only painful & difficult for others.
The same applies when you are stupid.
why can't you debunk anything i said?
see anyone did that yet?
you copoy and paste all day long, what else?
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59686777 see anyone did that yet?
you copoy and paste all day long, what else?
QM can't be debunked: all of the observed phenomena
can only fit into the QM Model, and all the
phenomena fight right into all of the Math.
Huge Evidence.
really?
1 electron and 1 proton, only force exist between them is f=Ke x pq/rr.
qm standard model, or bohr model, tell us how the atom is formed.
word salad and bs math equation mean shit in science.
shut up and calculate, calculate what?
e=mcc is total bs, yet the most famous science equation.
dude wrote that equation later admitted that he knows shit about energy/quantum.
you brainwashed yourself since the day you accepted a scientific theory without understanding the precise mechanism of it.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59686777
if you don't agree, why?
if you do agree, what scientific theories you think are true?
such as e=mcc, tbb theory,qm, relativity.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59686777 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59686777
if you don't agree, why?
if you do agree, what scientific theories you think are true?
such as e=mcc, tbb theory,qm, relativity.
"well, we don't know what Magnetism is we only know
what it does." ---- Richard Feynman
,
even a kid knows the same.
but scientists can bs a theory and get a phd and a good paid easy job.
how smart?
electrons can only move/vibrate along the plane perpendicular to the radius of the atoms on the surface of matters.
the electrical force/field is oscillating on the plane and the energy is propagating at 90 degrees.
this is all happening within matter/medium.
in the vacuum, the force between electrons on the sun surface and our outer atmosphere surface atoms instantly transfer the energy. pass it through the atmosphere to us.
the transverse wave only exists within matter.
man made em waves are a different story
the electrons vibrate a longer distance in the antenna, at much lower rate.
none scientist, or any science paper, has a clear, rational, precise definition of energy.
what is energy?
energy is moving electrostatic force carried by moving matter.
magnetic force and gravity are both electrostatic force in a different configuration.
gravity is induced attraction force between neutrally charged masses.
magnetic force is caused by off center/polarized nuclear/enertron ball of atoms.
that is why magnetic force decays at 1/rrr.
ring a bell?
1 electron carries 1 negative charge
if we smash the electron into 1000000 equal pieces, each piece will carry 1/1000000 negative charge. Let's call it enertron.
since enertrons carry the same negative charge, they repel each other.
if we have a perfect bottle, which means no leakage, no react, like glass bottle to air.
we put 1000000 enertrons into the perfect bottle, since enertrons repel each other, they put a pressure on the bottle wall. let's measure and call that pressure 1 volt.
if we put 2000000 enertrons into the same bottle, the pressure on the wall should be 2 volts.
now if 1 enertron is moving or vibrating, the rest all enertrons will be energized.
that is the mechanism of light/quantum.
now if we put 1 positive charge into the perfect bottle, what will happen?
enertrons should be attracted by the positive charge and form a ball around it, the closer to the positive charge the denser enertron cloud. the density of the enertron is decay at 1/rrr due to the repulsion force between enertrons decay at 1/rr.
the enertron cloud is always vibrating, due to the existence of energy, the unbalance attraction force and repulsion force, within the enertron cloud and the center positive charge.
now image enertron is the real thing, it carries a tiny negative charge, something like 1/10^33 electron charge, but it has a stronger force field, similar to neodymium magnet compare with iron magnet.
image proton actually carries 918 positive charges, it attracted 917 total charges of enertrons formed a solid ball, 1 electron attached to the ball to form a neutrally charged hydrogen atom. 1 atomic weight equals to 1936 total charges, no matter positive or negative charges.
this is the realistic atomic structure.
atoms are solid balls, matter is not compressible. such as water.
if atoms are constructed as science told you, why matter is not compressible? electron shell/wave/cloud/orbital are negatively charged, they do not stick to positive changed nuclear is a magic, how can they stand any force/impact/reaction without crashing?
why is energy conserved?
if you push/put a moving force on any enertron with a force f, that force is spreading to all the enertrons in the bottle at light speed, they all are moving now, and cannot stop ever.
do we have a perfect bottle?
yes, every atom is a perfect bottle. all matters are a perfect bottle. energy has nowhere to go but bounce within and between matters.
the forces f=Ke x e1e2/rr and f=G x m1m2/rr are like perfect springs between/within matters, connected all matters in 1.
WHENEVER A NUCLEAR IS OFF CENTER, MAGNETIC FORCE IS PRODUCED DUE TO THE UNBALANCE ENERTRON DENSITY.
therefore, magnetic force is an electrostatic force in nature but decays at 1/rrr.
science says electron/particle beams pass double slit showed same wave patterns.
i doubt. fake data, or fake data.
modern science lied so much, i can predict uit is a lie.
particle beam will never show wave property. in a medium or vacuum.
particles move a straight line along the force accelerates it.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59686777 i doubt. fake data, or fake data.
modern science lied so much, i can predict uit is a lie.
particle beam will never show wave property. in a medium or vacuum.
particles move a straight line along the force accelerates it.
well, both Photons and Electron exhibit Particle/Wave characteristic,
depending on the setting.
i don't think there's a Physicist in the World who would
dispute that.
and it's at the Foundation of QM itself.
shameless scientists cannot explain how atoms are formed.
they invented orbital model/bohr, improved it to the standard model, made up quantum mechanics.
push uncertainty principle, wave-particle duality, black holes, tbb, relativity, time travel, simulation, multiverse.
will, every dog has its day.
fake science is the next!
what probability?
there is only 1 probability, the attraction force between electron and proton in their models.
force and motion, the 2 particles under the law must collide.
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59686777 there is only 1 probability, the attraction force between electron and proton in their models.
force and motion, the 2 particles under the law must collide.
and that's because they are both made of electromagnetic stuff.
and you also have magnetic force between particles,
and that's aloso because they are made of electromagnetic stuff.
but, is it fields operating vis-a-vis with eachother or is
it particles.
quantum vacuum virtual plasma?
split a photon? take a pic of a photon?
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59686777 split a photon? take a pic of a photon?
yes they have made all of those empirical observations,
and that's the kind of stuff they are finding out there.
why is that their fault?
..
word salad, otherwise, please show me any empirical observations and their theory.
you still think photon is a real thing?
scientists took a 3 D picture of a photon?
and they can spit a photon?
more power to you!
i have been set free by the discoveries of Modern Science.
really?
free enough to teach me how 1 electron and 1 proton form into a hydrogen atom?
free enough to teach me what is energy?
what is gravity?
the mechanism of magnetic force?
Today's scientists have substituted mathematics for experiments, and they wander off through equation after equation and eventually build a structure which has no relation to reality. Nikola Tesla
so true
the establishment is deep, the momentum is huge.
but i dare to change its course.
because i found the truth.
with a little seed of faith, i will move the mountain.
so help me!
Quoting: Anonymous Coward 59686777 so true
the establishment is deep, the momentum is huge.
but i dare to change its course.
because i found the truth.
with a little seed of faith, i will move the mountain.
so help me!
the advancement of Humankind from being a monkey to now (20000 years)
has been stupendous over the past 200 years. all because
of rationality, reason and Science.
.
what's the rationality of qm? or relativity? or evolution?
http://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message3622806/pg18
No comments:
Post a Comment