Thursday, March 21, 2019

Is Dark Energy Getting Stronger?
174,693 views

7.4K

92

SHARE

SAVE


PBS Space Time
Published on Mar 20, 2019
SUBSCRIBE 1.5M
Learn More about The Great Courses Plus: http://ow.ly/wvWC30o0QYV

Check out the new Space Time Merch Store!
https://pbsspacetime.com/

Support Space Time on Patreon
https://www.patreon.com/pbsspacetime

The power of Dark Energy may be increasing as the universe ages. Subtle clues are emerging that the accepted model for the nature of dark energy and dark matter may not be all that. We saw the first such clue recently in our recent episode on the Crisis in Cosmology. Today we’re doing a Space Time Journal Club to reveal another clue. We’re looking at a new paper in Nature Astronomy, “Cosmological constraints from the Hubble diagram of quasars at high redshifts” by Risaliti and Lusso. It hints that the cosmological constant may not be so constant after all. In fact it may be increasing. If this is true, then our prediction for the future of our universe looks VERY different, and may involve the entire universe tearing itself to shreds at the subatomic level in the Big Rip.

On this edition of Space Time Journal Club we look at:
Risaliti & Lusso (2019) "Cosmological Constraints from the Hubble Diagram of Quasars at High Redshifts"
https://www.nature.com/articles/s4155...

#darkenergy #darkmatter #spacetime

More about The Great Courses Plus:
The Great Courses Plus is currently available to watch through a web browser to almost anyone in the world and optimized for the US, UK, and Australian markets. The Great Courses Plus is currently working to both optimize the product globally and accept credit card payments globally.

Learn More About Dark Energy Here:
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list...

Hosted by Matt O'Dowd
Written by Matt O'Dowd
Graphics by Aaron Halevy
Directing by Andrew Kornhaber

Special thanks to our Patreon Big Bang, Quasar and Hypernova Supporters:

Big Bang:
Anton Lifshits
coolascats
David Nicklas
Fabrice Eap
Juan Benet
Justin Lloyd
Tim Davis

Quasar:
James Flowers
Mark Rosenthal
Tambe Barsbay
Vinnie Falco

Hypernova:
chuck zegar
Danton Spivey
Donal Botkin
Edmund Fokschaner
Jens Theisen
John Hofmann
Jordan Young
Joseph Salomone
kkm
Mark Heising
Matthew O'Connor

Thanks to our Patreon Gamma Ray Burst Supporters:

Alexey Eromenko
Antonio Ruiz
Bradley Jenkins
Brandon Labonte
Buruk Aregawi
Carlo Mogavero
Daniel Lyons
David Behtala
David Crane
David Schmidt
Dustan Jones
Geoffrey Short
Greg Weiss
Jack Frosch
James Hughes
James Quintero
Jinal Doshi
JJ Bagnell
John Webber
Jon Folks
Jonah
Joseph Emison
Josh Thomas
Kenneth F Leonard
Kevin Warne
Kyle Hofer
Malte Ubl
Mark Vasile
Nathan Hitchings
Nicholas Rose
Nick Virtue
Ratfeast
Richard Broman
Scott Gossett
Sigurd Ruud Frivik
Tim Crookham
Tim Stephani
Tommy Mogensen
سلطان الخليفي
SHOW MORE
1,114 Comments
SORT BY
 Joe Chang
Add a public comment...
Dot
Dot
21 hours ago (edited)
I was thinking about what would happen if dark energy did get strong enough to rip apart sub atomic particles. In one of your other videos, I believe you mentioned that the energy invested in separating quark pairs, generates additional quarks to pair with the separated ones. Another commenter, Eric Lawrence, wanted to know what would happen to virtual particle pairs in such a universe.

If a universe enters a big rip on a subatomic level, would the energy of ripping apart quarks and virtual particles exponentially generate more matter? (2 quarks -> 4 -> 8 -> 16 -> ...)
And would any interesting phenomenon occur as a result of this spontaneous new matter?

I'm curious if anything resembling a big bang could arise from a big rip.




Edit: I've googled this question and got several results.
https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/ripping-apart-baryons-at-the-end-of-the-universe-creating-new-particles.670011/
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/159325/fate-of-a-hadron-in-a-big-rip
https://www.reddit.com/r/cosmology/comments/8p3dmv/question_if_the_big_rip_theory_is_correct_and_at/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2018/09/29/ask-ethan-could-the-big-rip-lead-to-another-big-bang/
https://www.forbes.com/sites/startswithabang/2016/03/18/ask-ethan-could-dark-energy-recycle-the-universe/
https://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0312440
https://www.quora.com/If-quark-pair-bonds-get-stronger-the-more-you-try-to-pull-them-apart-and-if-successfully-having-done-so-a-new-partner-is-created-how-would-the-Big-Rip-affect-this-phenomenon

From what I can tell, we can't find out the answer because, what else, we don't have a theory of quantum gravity.
- One possibility is that the new particles don't multiply fast enough (remember dark energy is increasing), and get ripped apart faster than light, thus generating new particles, that also get ripped apart and never get to interact in any interesting way.
- Another possibility is that these particles multiply fast enough , to generate enough gravity to overcome being ripped apart by dark energy.

An idea that stems from the second possibility is that the energy of creating those new particles lowers the energy inherent to space itself, creating a bubble of vacuum decay, removing the conditions for dark energy expansion, and thus spawning a new universe with potentially foreign physics.

This definitely is an interesting thought experiment.
Read more

361

REPLY

Hide replies
 Firaro
Firaro
21 hours ago
That virtual particle question got me wondering, though i don't think virtual particle pairs are real enough for ripping them apart to be sensible, but since all event horizons radiate would that mean a universe expanding that fast would be full of radiation or since it's expanding so fast would it all get stretched out till there was effectively no matter/energy beyond dark energy to within a rounding error.

7

REPLY

Lightblue Mobius
Lightblue Mobius
21 hours ago
Interesting question by the way, the last time I found one was a while ago. Looking forward to Matt's reply.

8

REPLY

Tomik Ex Boii
Tomik Ex Boii
21 hours ago
Simple. A Big Rip would create an infinite number of new universes. Suddenly BIg Bang makes sense.

18

REPLY

Brenden
Brenden
20 hours ago
@Firaro Black holes rip apart virtual pairs that would have otherwise annihilated though. Seems real enough.

4

REPLY

Ed TheDuck
Ed TheDuck
20 hours ago
I don’t know that much about this particular scenario but am led to believe that when the the expansion of spacetime gets to that level, it’s not long before it exceeds the speed of light which means everything becomes causally disconnected from everything else, i.e. interactions are no longer possible, so it doesn’t matter?

16

REPLY

Dom Verdi
Dom Verdi
20 hours ago
Came here to post about quarks too. If dark enerfy gets that strong it will create quarks black holes.

1

REPLY

Chris Heichel
Chris Heichel
20 hours ago
I hope he answers this question sounds very cool

4

REPLY

KUDr
KUDr
20 hours ago
Looks like it would end with a new inflation, and then a new universe(s?). Interesting ...

3

REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
20 hours ago
There is no light traveling in space at light speed. Light only exists in medium/air/water/glass. No way to tell stars distance, no way to measure mass. All things can only existing at forever ongoing now.

2

REPLY

KUDr
KUDr
20 hours ago
@Joe Chang You must be globe/space denier. Anyway, thanks for your very
entertaining answer.

25

REPLY

EebstertheGreat
EebstertheGreat
20 hours ago
The Big Rip is a singularity where all distances diverge to infinity in a finite time. The pressure from dark energy could only be comparable to the strong interaction an extremely tiny fraction of a second before the end of the universe. It is interesting to think about what would happen in that time, and I have no definite answers myself (though in inclined to think that nothing can really happen fast enough anyway, and the quarks would be redshifted away to nothing), but in any case it wouldn't stop the singularity.
Read more

2

REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
20 hours ago
@KUDr Fundamental Forces

All matters are made from atoms, all atoms are made from charged particles.

Charged particles only carry electrostatic force, therefore all forces matters carried must be electrostatic force in nature. Same charges repel each other, opposite charges attract each other.

Strong and weak force are imaginary, never can be measured or calculated. If there is strong force that can make protons stick together, there must be a strong force carrier, and it must be negative charged. If there is a weak force, what is the force carrier? What is its charge? How can all atoms are neutrally charged?

Magnetic force is circular electrostatic force carried by magnet or circular current. Magnet north pole carries clockwise electric force, south pole carries counterclockwise electric force. 

Coulomb's force and gravity are the most accurate measured forces in labs. Magnetic force is used daily.

From Coulomb's Law, we can calculate the universal levitation force between matter 1 and matter 2 at distance R, which is the repulsion force between lines of sight electrons on the surface of matter 1 and matter 2. F=Ke x q1q2/R^2, q1 and q2 are total charge of lines of sight electrons on matter 1 and matter 2.

Levity is 10^36 times stronger than gravity, how come matters are still attracting each other with gravity?

Because gravity is the net electrostatic force between charged particles between neutrally charged matters.

All positive charges in matter 1 attract all negative charges in matter 2 and repel all positive charges, all negative charges in matter 1 attract all positive charges in matter 2 and repel all negative charges.

Due to electrostatic force induction between neutrally charges matters, the net force is always a weak attraction force we called gravity F=G x m1m2/R^2.

Gravity causes matter formation, planet in orbit. Coulomb's force and levity causes all other nature phenomenon. Such as quantum entanglement, induction, photoelectric effect, radiation and light.

Forces are coexisting with matters, forces are continuing and instantaneously through out space, therefore energy able to teleport between matters.

Hot plasma on the Sun carry vibrating electrostatic force/energy, that energy teleport to Earth outer atmosphere through levity and propagate in air at light speed.

LIGO mistaken detected gravity wave from 1.3 billion years ago, gravity is instantaneous, gravity wave is instant. If gravity is not instantaneous, no planets can have stable orbit.

Scientists mistaken accurate measured Milky Way Galaxy total mass. They thought far away stars are from the past, light is photon particles traveling in space at light speed.

The fact is all matters and energy are existing at forever ongoing now, nothing is existing in the past or future.
There is no such thing as photon particle, no photon or EM wave traveling in space at light speed.

Light is vibrating electrostatic force carried by vibrating electrons passing through matter produced mechanical wave. Light can only coexist with matter, charge and plasma. Light speed in a medium is the rate of induction of electrostatic force. There is no light in space, light teleport between matters in space instantly.

Light wave and gravity wave teleport between matters. If gravity is not instantaneous, planets cannot have stable orbit. Forces are coexisting with matters, therefore forces are instantaneous. Forces don’t propagate, only matter waves propagate.

All theories based on light speed in vacuum space is C are mistaken.

Stars are not fusion reactors. Stars don’t radiate light into space at light speed at all directions. Energy must coexist with matter. Stars only share thermal energy with planets according to their distance. If stars are fusion reactors, where is all the energy produced in the past? Why the temperature of the universe is not raising up?

All energy is came from atom formation, opposite charged particles attract each other, same charged particles repel each other, atoms able to form and carry formation energy, which is vibration electrostatic force carried by vibrating charged particles. Every atom is a perpetual machine.

The more atoms attracted together under gravity, the bigger mass, the higher energy density, the higher temperature and the higher vibration frequency.

The Sun shares its thermal energy with Earth, also works as a heat sink, it keeps Earth temperature stable. All the heat we produced is radiated to the Sun, therefore Earth temperature is not raising up.

Energy is conserved, the universe is a perpetual machine, the big bang theory is mistaken.
Read more


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
20 hours ago
There is no dark matter but dark science. Scientists thought light speed in space is 3x10^8 m/s, the fact is there is no light in space. Light is energy, energy must coexist with matter/medium/air/water/glass.


REPLY

timbargen
timbargen
20 hours ago
That seems like it should create a collosal overdensity of matter and energy. Last time that happened was 13.8 bi...        hang on a second.

4

REPLY

William Rood
William Rood
20 hours ago
I was thinking about this same exact thing.  It would be awesome to have this addressed directly.

2

REPLY

kitrana
kitrana
20 hours ago
@Joe Chang see the thing i find most curious about this sort of thing is you have medium there which is basically anything that light could travel thourgh, but then you list air water and glass as something completly different. are they not mediums and if not why not?

3

REPLY

benedictul
benedictul
20 hours ago
I love your comment, Dot, and I think this is an awesome thought experiment. One could very well imagine that as subatomic particles lose their connection to the increasingly expanding, increasingly energetic surrounding Universe and eventually decay, the fundamental forces  as we know them, and time itself, would seize to have any meaning. This could be a Great Unification (or Great Nullification, if you will) event. And as you are looking at this increasingly uniform, almost featureless Universe, you would just have to zoom out a googolplex light years to see something that would very much resemble the beginning of our own (remember, at this point, time and space have no meaning anymore). A random fluctuation in this uniform bubble would set off something very similar to what we now call a Big Bang, creating a new, even stranger Universe. And perhaps at some point in the future (a new cycle?), a civilization that will have evolved in it will point their telescopes at the sky, and wonder if the patterns in the background radiation of their Universe are an epitaph of the galaxies and superstructures that used to occupy the previous iteration of spacetime.
Read more

7

REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
19 hours ago
@kitrana All matters are mediums. Some are transparent.


REPLY

D4yDre4mer
D4yDre4mer
19 hours ago
@Joe Chang lol

9

REPLY

KUDr
KUDr
19 hours ago
@Joe Chang Q: So every vacuum chamber turns dark once the air is pumped out of it? Does it happen suddenly or gradually? Did you ever observe something like that?

8

REPLY

Poifish Exists
Poifish Exists
19 hours ago
@Joe Chang From what I've gathered, photons aren't considered to be particles. It was decided they don't have any mass which means that any particles they interact with cannot and will not slow them down.

Everyone makes mistakes, but what we can do is learn from the ones we've made as well as the ones others have made. I hope you see it more clearly now.

If I'm wrong or if I wasn't specific enough, please correct me. Have a good day!
Read more

3

REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
19 hours ago
@KUDr The chamber carries light, not the vacuum.


REPLY

William Taylor
William Taylor
19 hours ago
What it comes down to is how to stack objects, particles are infinitely well stacked, so spacetime dont actually affect them because their density is above four dimensions, if you press them together, you can affect space, but not space affecting matter.  You could tune space to the particles and logic demons fly out of the bulk, googleplex nondecillion larger than quarks, but pure thought combination levels hell fairies.


REPLY

KUDr
KUDr
19 hours ago
@Joe Chang So if you let something fall in a big vacuum chamber, it will disappear during the time it is falling? Because then it is not connected to chamber itself so the chamber can't carry its light to/from this falling object.
(I must admit, that you are getting better and better.)

5

REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
19 hours ago
@Poifish Exists There are many theoretical nonsense being portrayed as science. The standard model, electromagnetism, quantum mechanics, relativity, the big bang theory, black hole, photon, time travel, dark matter, simulation.

Maxwell was wrong. there is no transverse wave/em wave moving at light speed in space, due to there is no force carrier in space.

Computer simulation can only produce digital signals, the real world is based on matter and energy.

Time is not a place, time has no location. Where is past or future? How to travel to nowhere?

Simple facts, can you see it?

NASA faked moon landing, some shadows are right under the object, means they made the video at noontime, which is not morning time as they said/should.

NASA, China, Japan all fake news about solar sails work in space, photons able to transfer momentum to solar sail to accelerate spaceship.
                         
They lied right in front your eyes.

If light/photon has momentum, why navy laser weapon has no kinetic impact? Why does light mill not moving in a hard vacuum?

All space missions are fake, since they faked the time delay for space radio transmission.

Light/em wave passes over vacuum space at an infinite speed, moves within mediums at light speed.

All scientists think light speed is 3 x 10^8 m/s in the vacuum space, they are all wrong.

If light speed is limited in vacuum space, all stars and galaxies we see are from the past, how can scientists map the universe and measure the total mass?

It is all lies.

There is no solar wind. What's its mechanism? Why protons and electrons on the way to earth do not attract each other and form into hydrogen atoms? Why does gravity not pulling them back into the Sun?

There is no Van Allen Belts. What's its mechanism? The Sun's energy/radiation/light strength decays at 1/R^2, the only way to find stronger radiation is to get closer to the Sun. Near around earth, radiation strength is the same, within the atmosphere, it decreases. So between earth and the moon, the radiation strength is about the same, less within our atmosphere.

EM drive? powered by quantum vacuum virtual plasma. it is pseudoscience. quantum anything is imaginary.

LIGO detected gravity wave from 1.3 billion years ago? You wave hand will produce more detectable gravity wave than far away stars explode. Why can't LIGO detect CME or earthquake?

Gravity speed is infinite, gravity has to be instantaneous, otherwise, no planets can stay in orbit.

Voyager is fake, escape velocity is a lie, gravity is decelerating it at all the times, how can it escape from the solar system? Gravity holds all planets in orbit, unless you have unlimited rocket fuel, nothing can escape. Do you really think 23 watt radio transmitter can send pictures over billions of miles?

ISS is fake, AC systems cannot work in vacuum space, heat cannot radiate into space but matter.

If heat can radiate into space, the earth will be as hot as the sun, the whole universe will be at the same temperature, thermal equilibrium.

Einstein was wrong about time dilation.

Put same atomic clocks in the sun, earth, mars, flying air plan, for 1 day.

Each clock will have a different reading.

Which time is dilated? which clock has correct time?

Time dilation is a misinterpretation of timer's moving rate/reading affected by gravity/acceleration/force upon it.

Time is not a thing, time has no location, cannot be touched, what is dilating what? How?

All things happening is at now, all existence is at now, time is forever ongoing now, all past became now, all future will become now.

What is space? Void, emptiness, nothingness, therefore, no property, no boundary, anything can fit in it.

How can gravity curve space? What is curving? Gravity is attraction force between matters/masses, there is no matter in space that can be curved.

How can gravity slow down light, so light cannot escape from big star so it becomes a black hole? If gravity can slow down light, why sunlight and flashlight have the same speed?

They took a picture of stars behind of the sun at that solar eclipse, to proved gravity bends light path?

It is another misinterpretation, hot plasma on the sun deflected star lights. our atmosphere deflects star lights the same principle.

The most famous equation e=mcc is a math trick, not fact.

Mass is condensed charged particles. energy is emf matter carried. totally different, cannot equivalent.

A 1 kg gold bar at rest has no energy but thermal energy, for it to carry 1kgcc energy, it must move at 1.414 c speed. how fast can we move a bullet?

Nuclear energy? 1 kg best fuel, how many % of it can produce heat?

The most famous experiment double slit is a misinterpretation, all waves are within a medium/matter waves, there is no light/wave in space.

Light is not wave nor particle, but electron's vibration force. try double slit experiment in a vacuum chamber, wave property will disappear.

The fabric of space-time? Ripples of gravity wave? Distortion?

What is the compound of the fabric or ripples? What is distorting what? What is the mechanism?

Why protons in an atom stick together but electron and proton don't stick together? Are protons gays?

Why did all scientists fall for such nonsense and made it mainstream?

Science today is religion.
Read more


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
19 hours ago
@KUDr The thing carries light.


REPLY

KUDr
KUDr
19 hours ago
@Joe Chang So how the light jumps from thing to my retina if the thing is in the vacuum? Can you please elaborate it a bit? Also ho would ring laser gyroscope work in your fantasy world?

4

REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
19 hours ago
@KUDr All stars and planets are in the vacuum. Light teleport from matter to matter.


REPLY

Zenothys
Zenothys
19 hours ago (edited)
Dot ...and could be the source of the exotic matter we need to create an ERB to get to other galaxies, which might actually be impossible if the EM instead directs us into said physically-foreign universe.

...Or both. Maybe quantum tunneling is much more common than we think, and the Fermi Paradox is due to our lack of ability to comprehend the appearance of sentience within a sort of disconnected, moving, complex body of various stellar events & images - a conglomerate entity of light, DE/DM, and quantum gravity that to us obviously wouldn't (doesn't) seem to have consciousness.

These cosmic "light shows" could be projections of a hypothetical future version of humanity that goes through the event horizon - implying that we could be projecting some sort of stellar events onto a "distant" civilization's rendered image of the CMB...which could just be OUR CMB.

While I don't believe everything is conscious, I do think everything might be part of an emergent-layered & horizonally-diffracted consciousness, with the human-accessed layers being identity/awareness, memory/subconscious, and instinct/unconscious - or at least, our distinct dynamic pattern of each as they are diffracted through the unique epigenetic codes we carry.

This implies that your dreams could be visions that people of the future would actually see while awake. They could also be visions of "updated" versions of our ancestors or pre-conscious selves... They could even be visions of day-to-day experiences happening at the exact same time in a foreign, physically unrecognizable alternate reality, with quantum tunneling using exotic matter and event horizons using information to transmit the image to you via tachyons and make you feel like you're really there by coupling them with gravitons (ghost, spectral, phantom, or otherwise).

The best interpretations I could find in my research were quantum consciousness, noogenesis (and the "omega point"), and the ekpyrotic/eukaryotic "living" universe. None of these are really satisfactory to me though...I guess I just really like thought experiments and YouTube commenting.

Definitely broke the "D.O.N.T." rule with this conjecture...
Read more

1

REPLY

KUDr
KUDr
19 hours ago
@Joe Chang But then we would not be able to produce interference in the vacuum. But we are. Also the radio waves would travel instantly in the vacuum, which they aren't. It takes ~2.5s to bounce the radio waves off the moon.
   Sorry, you should return to the reality, mate.

12

REPLY

Zenothys
Zenothys
19 hours ago (edited)
Ed TheDuck Well then it would become an isolated system of perfect equilibrium - a "sphere" - from which no energy or mass are emitted or absorbed but rather redirected at its border to propagate in whatever opposite "directions" it reached the membrane going in initially.

No events outside can interfere... Events are reflected by the perfectly spherical border... And you could say that the equilibrium interior is infinite... Nope, never heard of such a thing.
Read more


REPLY

demandred1957
demandred1957
19 hours ago
@KUDr come on man don't discourage him, that was the best made up fantasy shit I've read in a while.

5

REPLY

Zenothys
Zenothys
19 hours ago
Joe Chang tl;dr

2

REPLY

KUDr
KUDr
18 hours ago
@demandred1957 Yeah. I feel it the same. I still wonder if he is serious.

3

REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
18 hours ago
@demandred1957 Why all science forums banned my IP. Reddit blocked my question?

I asked 500 top physics professors the same question, not 1 reply, why?

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskPhysics/comments/anw1i9/i_think_i_discovered_a_new_force_how_do_you_think/

Because if the truth is out in public, that electromagnetism, relativity and QM are all BS, theoretical physicists will be laughed, Jobs lost, books burned?
Read more


REPLY

demandred1957
demandred1957
18 hours ago
@Joe Chang LOL! Wow. You are a special kind of crazy my friend. So publish your idea to a peer reviewed science journal. Let me know how that works out for ya. Either way, I feel I have won, since either, I have been highly entertained by a wacko's ideas, or I happened to heckle the next Einstein before they were discovered. It's a no lose situation for me.

12

REPLY

KUDr
KUDr
18 hours ago
@Joe Chang Maybe because it has nothing to do with physics. Your "question" belong to the category "entertainment". Or worse "antiscience" (like FE), becaise you completely dismiss all the evidence against your ideas. You should become a clown. People would take you more seriously, than now.

5

REPLY

demandred1957
demandred1957
18 hours ago
@Zenothys You didnt miss much.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
18 hours ago
@KUDr All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me no nearer to the answer to the question, 'What are light quanta?'
 Nowadays every Tom, D i c k and Harry thinks he knows it, but he is mistaken. -Albert Einstein 1954


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
18 hours ago
Is science definitely real?

Not at all.

Photoelectric effect theory won a Nobel Prize. But it is incorrect.

If photon has momentum, why navy laser weapon has no kinetic impact?

Why light mill does not move in hard vacuum?

Why photons don't slow down in water like bullets?

LIGO lied detected gravity wave for more funding.

Gravity is coexisted with all matters, therefore gravity wave must be instantaneous.

If gravity speed is not infinite, planets cannot stay in stable orbit.

Simple facts, why Nobel Prize awarded to LIGO?

Science is controlled religion.
Read more


REPLY

Smerg the Dargon
Smerg the Dargon
18 hours ago
"If photon has momentum, why navy laser weapon has no kinetic impact?"
Because it's a pathetically tiny amount of momentum.

"Why photons don't slow down in water like bullets?"
THEY (sort of) DO
Read more

4

REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
17 hours ago
@Smerg the Dargon How can tiny momentum burn down a plane? Tiny momentum will stop in water like bullets.


REPLY

KUDr
KUDr
17 hours ago (edited)
@Joe Chang When LIGO detected neutron stars merge event, they announced it and all telescopes on that hemisphere turned in the direction announced by LIGO and they were able to see it, measure its spectrum, etc. LIGO really works.
   Why don't you try to explain the time that radio waves need to travel to the moon and back? Or why interferometry works in vacuum. How ring laser gyroscope detects rotation via interference when the light inside it travels in vacuum? How radar altimetry from orbit (using interference patterns) works? And many many other questions that would arise if you were right. You can't just destroy everything without empirical evidence just because you think you are  right. This is called antiscience.
Read more

3

REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
17 hours ago
You know better than Einstein? Better than those top 500 professors?

1

REPLY

Fiercesoulking
Fiercesoulking
17 hours ago
I once asked myself what  if the big rip  is already here or what would happen if you tear/cut space apart ? The fascinating thing was in the simplest models you get a gravity sink. A region in space which has another energy level then the normal space => Dark Matter . Then there was a problem why isn't the ratio of dark matter and dark energy not 1:1? The answer is the energy in dark energy don't reach you fully because its limited by the speed of light and also the amount of energy in which can be stored  in space expands with the universe like a spring which expands itself while being pulled .
Read more

1

REPLY

KUDr
KUDr
17 hours ago (edited)
@Joe Chang Which "top 500 professors"? Post a link to the page where it is documented so that I can learn something about what you are saying.
   Everything what I pointed you out are well known facts. Confirmed by experiments and observations. I worked on construction of remote sensing instruments for ~25 yrs and I know that these instruments work and how.
   Or do you want to say that all the instruments based on interferometry in the vacuum are not real? Do you have any kind of evidence for such extraordinary claims?
Read more

2

REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
17 hours ago
@KUDr Lies. LIGO detected gravity wave, calculated few months before announce it. When president talk to Apollo on the moon, audio was instant. The moon landing is faked.


REPLY

KUDr
KUDr
17 hours ago
@Joe Chang OK, the case is closed. It was wasted time with crazy "conspiracy theorist". Everything are lies, and all interferometry in vacuum is not real. Radio amateurs that hear themselves back when making EME connections are probably part of that conspiracy. And because I was also radioamateur and made moon bouncing connections 40 yrs ago, I am also a part of that conspiracy.
   Have a nice day!
Read more

9

REPLY

caffiend81
caffiend81
16 hours ago
You beat me to this question! It's something I have always wondered about a Big Rip scenario ever since I first heard about how quark behave when pulled apart. Hope we get a reply :)

2

REPLY

Not Justin
Not Justin
16 hours ago
@Joe Chang begone, your religion isn't welcome here.

8

REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
16 hours ago
@Not Justin All things have precise mechanism. Without understanding the mechanism of light, people are blind. Newton discovered gravity, I discovered levity. Don't hate the messenger. I showed you the true mechanism of light and energy.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
16 hours ago
Hold a magnet in each hand, same poles face each other and feel the force. Wave one hand, feel the energy teleport to other hand? Levity is 10^36 stronger than magnetic force.


REPLY

Dinoxaur Projects
Dinoxaur Projects
15 hours ago
@Joe Chang, everyone. The genius with the big genius idea that, of course, like any genius, debates about it on the internet where he can't be held accountable; a genius with a mind which can be compared Isaac Newton! I will give you credit the Isaac Newton comparison, though, you have his inflated ego down perfect...
I don't care if this is a troll, this is pure gold!

4

REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
15 hours ago
@Dinoxaur Projects If Coulomb's force is fact, levity is fact. If not, why 500 professors no one correct me? I don't have much ego. Only hope more people can see what I see about nature.


REPLY

Bear Lemley
Bear Lemley
15 hours ago
Joe Chang
Is this the Joe Chang comedy show thing?

4

REPLY

Narret
Narret
15 hours ago
From what I understand, you cannot generate new energy, that energy would have to come from the big rip itself. But it could very well be a possibility that a uniform generation of quark pairs and such gets created, but you would never end up with another big bang, the gravitational interactions are far too weak, and the universe far too expansive by then...

1

REPLY

The Real Flenuan
The Real Flenuan
15 hours ago
You must keep in mind that the net amount of energy in the universe is ZERO. Everything cancels out, and there is no untapped infinite reservoir of quantum vacuum energy or anything of that sort. I can pretty confidently say that no, it takes energy to rip the universe apart. We don't know where dark energy comes from, but whatever energy it exerts, if used to create particles, doesn't generate more energy.
Regardless of what would happen in reality, you're right that it's beyond the extent of current knowledge to predict. However it might be even beyond the extent of any current physics. Maybe a quantum information–based theory of everything will one day shed some light on it.
Read more

2

REPLY

Beata Graff av dalHagen
Beata Graff av dalHagen
15 hours ago
I have similar thoughts, wondering if runaway inflation could overcome color confinement, and if conformal rescaling could blow that into a cosmos wth a net charge. Admittedly, I really want to violate confinement.

1

REPLY

GravianS
GravianS
15 hours ago (edited)
That last idea you have is one that has been kicking around for a while. It's especially interesting because it not only could explain how our universe will end, but how it began as well, painting the picture of a cyclic, potentially self sustaining space time.

The million dollar question is if the laws of physics are created by what we call the fabric of space, or if space time as we know it instead created by the laws of physics. Depending on which of these it is, we could get a universe with completely new physics, or one with the same physics, just a larger volume of matter, thus mechanically the same and structurally different.
Read more

2

REPLY

The Real Flenuan
The Real Flenuan
15 hours ago
@Joe Chang Science is not based on faith you stupid dense fuck

2

REPLY

The Real Flenuan
The Real Flenuan
15 hours ago
@Joe Chang You're claiming that YOU know better than Einstein, and all physicists, and all physics professors, and yet you see no irony. Lmao, you a very entertaining specimen.

2

REPLY

The Real Flenuan
The Real Flenuan
15 hours ago
@Joe Chang Some day you're going to have to accept the reality that you're not a super genius. You're a victim of your own self-applauding delusion of grandeur.
Science is not a set of beliefs. Scientists don't all agree on one view of reality. Science TESTS all kinds of crazy ideas, and it is based on the crazy ideas that are shown to be RIGHT. Your worldview is based on thinking "I must be right" because you don't understand what the fuck you're talking about.
Science is a process of questioning assumptions and questioning ideas about reality, something which you very sadly do not yet understand.
Read more

2

REPLY

JxKITCH
JxKITCH
15 hours ago
@Joe Chang I believe you're confusing light and sound

1

REPLY

The Real Flenuan
The Real Flenuan
15 hours ago (edited)
@Joe Chang It is very sad that you cannot accept the fact that reality can be understood. You want reality to be more interesting, so you make up fantasies to fulfill that void in your mind. I hope one day you see the beauty and awe inherent in understanding, in actual discovery, in mathematics, in the predictive power of science, and in what is real.
Being in awe of reality does not need to involve creating bullshit.
Read more

2

REPLY

Dinoxaur Projects
Dinoxaur Projects
15 hours ago
@Joe Chang still haven't proven any of these so-called professors exist. Anyone who can't verify their credentials and thinks they can just easily rewrite all laws of physics has a ego 100%.

2

REPLY

Bear Lemley
Bear Lemley
15 hours ago
The Real Flenuan
I don’t think Joe Change is a sdf, it may be something else.

https://youtu.be/RvN_iu0fXrc


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
14 hours ago
@Dinoxaur Projects I have 500 sent mail in gmail. Someone deleted my comment. https://www.godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message3995021/pg1


REPLY

Nelo
Nelo
14 hours ago
Holy shit! Big RIP explains big bang!


REPLY

ebigunso
ebigunso
14 hours ago (edited)
@Brenden Go watch the Hawking Radiation episode. That explanation is the "lies to children" one, and the true explanation is given there.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
14 hours ago
@Bear Lemley Thank you. I figured out how magnet works after that video. Off center nucleus theory was wrong.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
14 hours ago
@Nelo Energy is conserved, matter is conserved, big bang is a very stupid theory for stupid people.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
14 hours ago
Once you understood the mechanism of light, you can see all the science lies/mistakes. Read my comments carefully. You are lucky, you will never find those info in books.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
14 hours ago
What is light?

Light is energy, energy must coexist with matter. There is no light in the space between hot plasma on the Sun and atmosphere on Earth.

All scientists thought light is EM wave or photon particle or both traveling in space at light speed. They are all wrong. There is no wave, no photon, nothing traveling in space at light speed. Energy jumps from matter to matter instantly, becomes light wave traveling in medium at light speed. Light speed in vacuum space is infinite. Therefore, relativity, QM and electromagnetism are all wrong.

By using MIT 10 trillion frame per second high speed camera, scientists can measure light speed in a vacuum glass bottle to prove light speed in vacuum is infinite. But they won't do it, because if the truth is out, they will be in big trouble.

Electromagnetic Radiation

Electrons are on the surface of all matters. Electrons are constantly vibrating due to the thermal energy atoms carried. The higher temperature the higher vibration frequency.

Vibrating electrons carry kinetic energy, that energy can transfer to distant electrons through the repulsion force between line of sight electrons, science call it electromagnetic radiation. In Fact, there is only electrostatic radiation, there is no electromagnetic radiation. 

Between 2 electrons at distance r, the repulsion force F=Ke x ee/rr is the conductor of electrostatic radiation. This force is acting as a mass less stiff rod, entangled the two electrons as 1.

There are two kinds of radiation. When an electron vibrating at right angle to the radius of the atom, it produces transverse radiation. When electron vibrating at radius direction, it produces longitudinal radiation. Both radiation must coexist with matter.

In transverse radiation, this force is acting as mass less stiff rod, if 1 electron is moving the other electron will instantly receiving an opposite direction emf.

In longitudinal radiation, this force is acting as mass less stiff rod, instantly transfer emf between electrons.

When radiation/emf moving in a medium, it causes mechanical wave in the medium, science call it EM wave.

The Sun does not radiate EM wave into space, only radiate emf to matters.
Read more


REPLY

Yosef MacGruber
Yosef MacGruber
13 hours ago
How do we know that dark energy is even a thing? The fake-science theories get weirder and weirder. Sounds more and more like sci-fi or making stuff up so as to hear themselves talk and feel important. Next decade, they will have some new theory, to try to explain away all the errors and problems of their previous wrong theories.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
12 hours ago
@Yosef MacGruber Rational thinker! When they say stfu and calculate, you should know QM is BS. 

The biggest mistake in science is the standard model of atomic structure theory.

Theory says 1 electron and 1 proton can form a hydrogen atom. This is impossible.

There is only 1 force F=Ke x re/R^2 existing between those two opposite charged particles, the only motion possible is acceleration toward each other on a straight line, collide and stick together. Electron is impossible to orbit or wave or cloud proton to form a stable atom, there is no such mechanism.

Theory says atoms are 99.99% empty space. This is impossible, because liquid and solid matters are incompressible.

Why those simple facts are not in textbooks? Because science is still controlled religion.

Before we truly understood atomic structure, we can not understand the universe, all theories are just theories.


The second mistake is light speed in vacuum space is 3x10^8 m/s.

Relativity, QM, cosmology are all based on light speed in vacuum space is C.

In fact, light only exists in matter/air/water/medium, there is no light, no photon or EM wave traveling in space a light speed. Light only exists in hot plasma on the Sun and atmosphere on Earth.

Energy must coexist with matter. Light teleport from matter to matter, propagate in medium at light speed. Light speed is the rate of induction of electrostatic force in the medium.

We can measure light speed in a vacuum glass bottle using MIT10 trillion frame per second camera to prove light speed in vacuum is infinite.

But no scientists will do it. Light speed in vacuum is infinite to scientists is equal to their God is fake. The whole modern physics is based on light speed in vacuum is 3x10^8 m/s.

All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me no nearer to the answer to the question, 'What are light quanta?' Nowadays every Tom, D i c k and Harry thinks he knows it, but he is mistaken. -Albert Einstein 1954

There is no photon particle existing. Light only exists in the hot plasma on the Sun and atmosphere on Earth, there is no light, no photon, no EM wave traveling in space at light speed. All scientists are wrong.
Read more


REPLY

Yosef MacGruber
Yosef MacGruber
12 hours ago
@Joe Chang
Your theories appear to not be supported by science. They are too wacko for me to individually deal with them. If your theories had any basis, I should expect to see a little more evidence to support your theories. The atom model perhaps is simplistic, but then, it deals with a realm kind of hard to understand. But simplistic does not necessary mean wrong, but rather incomplete.

But there is a massive cult following of fake science. Pretenders pushing wrong and destructive theories, with really little or no basis in science and little or no evidence shown. No proof. Evolution theory, climate change, overpopulation, the idea that the manned moon landings couldn't possibly have been faked, that 9-11 surely had to happen as the government says and not the conspiracy theorists saying it was an inside job.

The liar mad-scientists seem very determined to make sure that we do not believe that there is already free-energy technology that is being suppressed by the NWO. Free-energy would show some of their theories to be wrong, and they treat that as some sort of "heresy" against their fake-science religion, and it shows that they are not quite as smart as they pretended to be. The universe is full of energy so why are we paying for energy? Energy should be free by now.
Read more


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
12 hours ago
@Yosef MacGruber You can see all you can see, no more no less. There is no free energy. You don't even know what is energy.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
12 hours ago
Richard Feynman said, "It is important to realize that in physics today, we have no knowledge what energy is. We do not have a picture that energy comes in little blobs of a definite amount." Is this statement still true today with the new discoveries that LHC is making?


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
11 hours ago
What is energy?

Energy is motive force carried by motion matter. Energy is force at motion, F=ma, E=Fd.

Hold a strong magnet in each hand, same poles face each other, feel the repulsion force?

Now wave 1 hand, does energy instantly teleport to other hand?

Electrostatic force is 10^33 times stronger than magnetic force. It has infinite range.

Energy must coexist with matter, charges or plasma.

Force is continuing and instantaneous between matters, therefore energy able to teleport between matters.

All energy came from atom formation.
Read more


REPLY

MikeRosoftJH
MikeRosoftJH
11 hours ago
@Joe Chang: You have sent your theory to 500 professors - and are surprised that none of them replied. Do you really believe that professors have nothing else to do the whole day than to disprove every crackpot theory somebody e-mails to them? (If they even got the message and it wasn't caught by some spam filter on the way.)

The matter of fact is: your claim that light doesn't travel in vacuum is wrong, and can be (and has been) readily disproven by experiment. Your ad hoc rationalizations notwithstanding.
Read more

2

REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
11 hours ago
@MikeRosoftJH What experiment proved light travel in vacuum at light speed? Those email address are from university website. I asked Neil etc top scientists on their facebook, no one reply. If you know Coulomb's Law, you should know levity is real thing. Otherwise, you don't have rational thinking.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
11 hours ago
In fact, rational thinker will not accept any theory without understanding precise mechanism behind. Read and believe is very unwise.Follow and believe is sheeple.


REPLY

Yosef MacGruber
Yosef MacGruber
11 hours ago
@Joe Chang
Speak for yourself. I think most of us have some idea what energy is, except for you. Energy is not simply a magnetic force. Force by itself, does not represent energy. Power is energy divided by time. So energy is power multiplied by time. A 500 mA-hour battery, can produce 500 mili-amps for an hour, or 5 amps for 6 minutes or 50 mili-amps for 10 hours. The battery also has a voltage that would be needed to calculate the power, and actually the proper energy capacity of it. The mili-amp-hour rating is a measure of how much energy that the battery can store. Work is force multiplied by the distance that it travels over.

And why are you so sure that free-energy does not exist? Are you really that gullible? We do not see all that there is. The visible light spectrum, is but a tiny sliver of the electromagnetic spectrum. You could play a Splinter Cell video game, with thermal and night vision goggles, and perhaps even vision of devices putting out electromagnetic radiation, to get a hint of what you are normally not seeing, but is there. Of course a video game is probably not that accurate, being based more in fun and not so much in realism, but does sort of give the idea. Electricity is invisible, but we can see some of its effects.

The scientists do not know as much as they often like to pretend that they do. There is much that they still do not much understand, and some of their theories surely are wrong or at least "not quite right". Thus, all the more reason why they are unable to prove that free-energy is impossible.
Read more


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
11 hours ago
NASA land on the moon must at morning time to avoid high heat as they stated. Go watch Apollo videos. If you find shadows are right under the objects as if the Sun is over head, you know it is faked.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
11 hours ago
@Yosef MacGruber All you said are from reading. Little thinking. Energy must coexist with matter. No free matter, no free energy. Fusion been scam $ for 80 years now, it is not even half free energy.


REPLY

Łukasz Roguski
Łukasz Roguski
9 hours ago
That's how the universes reproduce...

1

REPLY

Yosef MacGruber
Yosef MacGruber
4 hours ago (edited)
@Joe Chang
Shadows going different directions, stage hot spot lighting problems, camera hash marks added after the fact, cameras that they claim that they used would not function at the temperatures they would have encountered, etc. Watch YT manned moon landings were faked documentaries and tell me if their claims of fakery are plausible?

A penny contains enough energy within its matter, to last a person a lifetime. Thus, can you pay 1¢ for your lifetime of energy? If matter = energy, then energy is or will be free. Or does E=mc^2 not mean anything?
Read more


REPLY

Yosef MacGruber
Yosef MacGruber
4 hours ago
@Łukasz Roguski
Have you seen a universe reproduce? has anybody seen another universe?

"That's how the universes reproduce" makes references to sci-fi make-believe silly theories, and yet you said it as if you are talking about science or fact?
Read more


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
3 hours ago
@Yosef MacGruber Yes, e=MC^2 equals BS.


REPLY

Yosef MacGruber
Yosef MacGruber
2 hours ago
@Joe Chang
I see that you are a dunce when it comes to science.

So do you even have a clue from where does the sun get its energy?

Dark energy destroying the universe, is what is BS. How do we even know that dark matter and dark energy is a thing? Supposedly, they have so little effect upon the visible universe, that they are hard to detect. Hence, why they are called "dark". What are they, but giant fudge factors to cover that some of the mad-scientist theories are just wrong?

Where the Bible says that God spread out the heavens, and then evolutionists try to explain away a divine act of creation in terms of natural forces that we observe now, might be about where they erred.
Read more


REPLY

Shufei
Shufei
2 hours ago
It’s pretty annoying that this thread was highjacked by a conspiracist.  The paranoia of “lying science” alone renders his ideas moot.  But they are developed to a high degree and deserve a comprehensive refute.  The theme of dismissing him on grounds of authority (“he’s challenging Einstein”) isn’t persuasive.  I’d like to see some channel dedicated to taking on radically bizarre theories such as “levity” and flat earth.  Until then, I thank Joe Chang for asking questions of basic issues, even if his proposed theories resort to bad faith in a very non-persuasive way.  We should always review basic assumptions from time to time.
Read more

2

REPLY

Firaro
Firaro
2 hours ago
Brenden
As discussed on this channel in the hawking radiation, horizon radiation and unruh effect episodes that is not an accurate representation of what happens. It is related to removing particular vibrational modes from the fields in the region causing an imbalance that manifests as energetic particles. But I'm probably butchering the topic, their videos do a much better job at explaining it.
Read more


REPLY

Yosef MacGruber
Yosef MacGruber
2 hours ago
@Shufei
Science does not lie. Rather, fakers who pretend to do science, lie.

Know why flat earth is such a popular theory? Not for its scientific merits, but due to many people tired of being lied to by the massive cult of rampant fake science, who sad to say of flat earthers, they do not know enough about science. The round earth model, so much better explains what we see. But flat earthers are easy to talk to, because they do not believe all the fake science BS and they are more open-minded than the usual educated idiots.
Read more


REPLY

Firaro
Firaro
1 hour ago (edited)
Joe Chang
Do you have any experimental evidence for your ideas?

They have tested this by the way, they put retroreflectors on the moon and regularly bounce lasers off of it to measure the distance to the moon. If the speed of light in space were infinite that would significantly mess up their calculations and they would notice the discrepancy of measuring distance with the laser vs measuring it using trigonometry as they did before they had the retroreflector on it (and as any dedicated astronomer can). And because of how retroreflectors work anyone can do the same experiment, check the distance to the moon using lasers. Of course it requires a laser rangefinder capable of targeting something that far away. But there's no experiment that can test the speed of something as fast as light without requiring precision equipment.

If you did that experiment and actually found it took less than 2 seconds for the light to get to the moon and back then you would get the attention of the scientific community, everyone would be performing the same experiment and realising their current theories were wrong.
Read more


REPLY

Yosef MacGruber
Yosef MacGruber
1 hour ago (edited)
@Firaro
If the speed of light was infinite, then our GPS navigators would not work. Sad to say, so many people hardly know how anything works. GPS navigators are specialized computers that analyze time-coded GPS signals from several low-orbit satellites, and are able to calculate the distances that the signals traveled, and triangulate, which allows for them to calculate latitude and longitude (and even altitude with signals from 4 or more satellites) to a very high accuracy, allowing them to always know where they are on the map, which then allows for them to use their internal map database to give turn-by-turn directions. Infinite light speed would destroy the method by which the distances are calculated, as the time-codes would not have varying travel-distance delays like they do now.

But not all of what pretends to be science, has been scientifically tested nor verified, and some perverse political motives lead immoral radicals to lie and pretend like they are doing science. Yet does Al Gore have any scientific credentials? Yet his crock-umentary "An Inconvenient Truth" pretends to be science?
Read more


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
1 hour ago
@Shufei Einstein theories are all BS. He won Nobel for photoelectric effect theory not relativity. If there is no light traveling in space at light speed, relativity, QM, electromagnetism and cosmology are all wrong. If you understand QM, how can you not understand levity? I told you why Nobel is BS. No one debunked me yet.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
1 hour ago
@Yosef MacGruber Good reader and repeater. I am sure you did not read my comment, or you don't have rational thinking.


REPLY

MikeRosoftJH
MikeRosoftJH
55 minutes ago
Dozens of experiments and observations have verified that light travels at finite speed in vacuum. For instance, the very first hint that speed of light is finite was the observed irregularity of the apparent motion of the moons of Jupiter; the 17th century astronomer Ole Rømer correctly concluded that the irregularity was caused by the varying distance of Jupiter from Earth and the time taken by light to reach Earth. For the second example, the speed of light can be used to measure the distance of Moon from Earth: send a light signal towards the Moon and measure the time until it bounces back. The time taken will be something less than 3 seconds; so the Moon's distance is less than 1.5 light seconds, or about 400.000 km. (And regardless of your claims to the contrary, there was a delay in radio communication with astronauts on the Moon.) Speed of light can, of course, be measured on the Earth as well, using precision instruments. (I can direct you to the Wikipedia article "Speed of light".) It is, for example, relevant in particle experiments. (As a curiosity: There has been an experiment which suggested that neutrinos were in fact propagating faster than the speed of light. This would have been a major breakthrough - evidence that photons have rest mass and don't actually travel at the maximum possible speed. But after review, it has been found to be an artifact of a flaw in the experiment - a loose cable delayed the signal, and when this delay was taken into account, the result was that speed of photons and neutrinos is the same within margin of error.)
Read more

1

REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
48 minutes ago
@Firaro I suggest 500 top scientists using MIT tech to measure light speed in vacuum, no one reply. Why? The latest time they measure light speed in air was 1926. You think everything they said is correct? Light speed in vacuum has never been measured. They lie all the times. There is no gravity wave, why LIGO cannot detect CME or Earth quake? Hey cannot measure Galaxy mass, cannot BS how many atoms were created in the first second in big bang, but they did. Wake, sheeple, you are my brothers and sisters.
Show less


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
43 minutes ago
@MikeRosoftJH Prediction is not accurate measurement. All you said but copy and paste.

1

REPLY

Bobby Sanchez
Bobby Sanchez
7 minutes ago
Joe Chang Lol you do realize that dark matter/dark energy refers to the abnormalities in matter/energy that have been observed, right? We just give them names—they’re essentially conceptual placeholders. For all we know the aberrant velocities occurring at the outer rims of galaxies may very well be caused by an abundance of collapsed matter, which would serve as the physical embodiment of the so-called dark energy.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
6 minutes ago
@Shufei Levity is as true as gravity, as strong as Coulomb's force. People thought it existing long time ago. I am just lucky enough to prove it is true by using Coulomb's law. Deny levity is equal to deny the best physics laws. That is why 500 pro's all keep quite, no one can debunk me.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
4 minutes ago
@Bobby Sanchez They cannot measure the total mass of the universe, it is all BS.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
1 second ago
500 top professors found out their God is fake. So broken heart. Wet themselves.

Sunday, March 17, 2019

Fundamental Forces

All matters are made from atoms, all atoms are made from charged particles.

Charged particles only carry electrostatic force, therefore all forces matters carried must be electrostatic force in nature. Same charges repel each other, opposite charges attract each other.

Strong and weak force are imaginary, never can be measured or calculated. If there is strong force that can make protons stick together, there must be a strong force carrier, and it must be negative charged. If there is a weak force, what is the force carrier? What is its charge? How can all atoms are neutrally charged?

Magnetic force is circular electrostatic force carried by magnet or circular current. Magnet north pole carries clockwise electric force, south pole carries counterclockwise electric force.   

Coulomb's force and gravity are the most accurate measured forces in labs. Magnetic force is used daily.

From Coulomb's Law, we can calculate the universal levitation force between matter 1 and matter 2 at distance R, which is the repulsion force between lines of sight electrons on the surface of matter 1 and matter 2. F=Ke x q1q2/R^2, q1 and q2 are total charge of lines of sight electrons on matter 1 and matter 2.

Levity is 10^36 times stronger than gravity, how come matters are still attracting each other with gravity?

Because gravity is the net electrostatic force between charged particles between neutrally charged matters.

All positive charges in matter 1 attract all negative charges in matter 2 and repel all positive charges, all negative charges in matter 1 attract all positive charges in matter 2 and repel all negative charges.

Due to electrostatic force induction between neutrally charges matters, the net force is always a weak attraction force we called gravity F=G x m1m2/R^2.

Gravity causes matter formation, planet in orbit. Coulomb's force and levity causes all other nature phenomenon. Such as quantum entanglement, induction, photoelectric effect, radiation and light.

Forces are coexisting with matters, forces are continuing and instantaneously through out space, therefore energy able to teleport between matters. 

Hot plasma on the Sun carry vibrating electrostatic force/energy, that energy teleport to Earth outer atmosphere through levity and propagate in air at light speed.

LIGO mistaken detected gravity wave from 1.3 billion years ago, gravity is instantaneous, gravity wave is instant. If gravity is not instantaneous, no planets can have stable orbit. 

Scientists mistaken accurate measured Milky Way Galaxy total mass. They thought far away stars are from the past, light is photon particles traveling in space at light speed. 

The fact is all matters and energy are existing at forever ongoing now, nothing is existing in the past or future. 
There is no such thing as photon particle, no photon or EM wave traveling in space at light speed. 

Light is vibrating electrostatic force carried by vibrating electrons propagating through matter produced mechanical wave. Light can only coexist with matter, charge and plasma. Light speed in a medium is the rate of induction of electrostatic force. There is no light in space, light teleport between matters in space instantly.

All theories based on light speed in vacuum space is C are mistaken.

Stars are not fusion reactors. Stars don’t radiate light into space at light speed at all directions. Energy must coexist with matter. Stars only radiate thermal energy with planets according to their distance. If stars are fusion reactors, where is all the energy produced in the past? Why the temperature of the universe is not raising up?

All energy is came from atom formation, opposite charged particles attract each other, same charged particles repel each other, atoms able to form and carry formation energy, which is vibration electrostatic force carried by vibrating charged particles. Every atom is a perpetual machine.

The more atoms attracted together under gravity, the bigger mass, the higher energy density, the higher temperature and the higher vibration frequency. 

The Sun shares its thermal energy with Earth, also works as a heat sink, it keeps Earth temperature stable. All the heat we produced is radiated to the Sun, therefore Earth temperature is not raising up. 

Energy is conserved, the universe is a perpetual machine, the big bang theory is mistaken.

Friday, March 15, 2019

Is science definitely real?

Not at all.

Photoelectric effect theory won a Nobel Prize. But it is incorrect.

If photon has momentum, why navy laser weapon has no kinetic impact?

Why light mill does not move in hard vacuum?

Why photons don't slow down in water like bullets?

LIGO lied detected gravity wave for more funding.

Gravity is coexisted with all matters, therefore gravity wave must be instantaneous.

If gravity speed is not infinite, planets cannot stay in stable orbit.

Simple facts, why Nobel Prize awarded to LIGO?

Science is controlled religion.
The biggest mistake in science is the standard model of atomic structure theory.

Theory says 1 electron and 1 proton can form a hydrogen atom. This is impossible.

There is only 1 force F=Ke x re/R^2 existing between those two opposite charged particles, the only motion possible is acceleration toward each other on a straight line, collide and stick together. Like two magnets attract each other and stick together, like apples full on Earth. Electron is impossible to orbit or wave or cloud proton to form a stable atom, there is no such mechanism.

Theory says atoms are 99.99% empty space. This is impossible, because matter is not 99% compressible.

Why those simple facts are not in textbooks? Because science is still controlled religion.

Before we truly understood atomic structure, we can not understand the universe, all theories are just theories.


The second mistake is light speed in vacuum space is 3x10^8 m/s.

Relativity, QM, cosmology are all based on light speed in vacuum space is C.

In fact, light only exists in matter/air/water/medium, there is no light, no photon or EM wave traveling in space at light speed. Light only exists in hot plasma on the Sun and atmosphere on Earth.

Energy must coexist with matter. Light teleport from matter to matter, propagate in medium at light speed. Light speed is the rate of induction of electrostatic force in the medium.

We can measure light speed in a vacuum glass bottle using MIT10 trillion frame per second camera to prove light speed in vacuum is infinite.

But no scientists will do it. Light speed in vacuum is infinite to scientists is equal to their God is fake. The whole modern physics is based on light speed in vacuum is 3x10^8 m/s.

All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me no nearer to the answer to the question, 'What are light quanta?' Nowadays every Tom, D i c k and Harry thinks he knows it, but he is mistaken. -Albert Einstein 1954

There is no photon particle existing. Light only exists in the hot plasma on the Sun and atmosphere on Earth, there is no light, no photon, no EM wave traveling in space at light speed. All scientists are wrong.

Wednesday, March 13, 2019

Sunday, March 10, 2019

What is energy?

Energy is motive force carried by motion matter. Energy is force at motion, F=ma, E=Fd.

Hold a strong magnet in each hand, same poles face each other, feel the repulsion force?

Now wave 1 hand, does energy instantly teleport to other hand?

Electrostatic force is 10^33 times stronger than magnetic force. It has infinite range.

Energy must coexist with matter, charges or plasma.

Force is continuing and instantaneous between matters, therefore energy able to teleport between matters.

All energy came from atom formation.

Saturday, March 9, 2019

Seeker
Published on Mar 8, 2019
SUBSCRIBE 3.8M
Once this $35 million upgrade is in place, LIGO will start using something called quantum "squeezed light." So, what does that mean exactly?

LIGO's Gravitational Wave Discovery Is Still In Question, But Why? - https://youtu.be/aQ1entvy7vI


Joe Chang
Add a public comment...
Sebastian Elytron
Sebastian Elytron
4 days ago
Did Einstein predict this?

50

REPLY

Hide replies
 Godly
Godly
4 days ago
He actually did

9

REPLY

Master Therion
Master Therion
4 days ago
Einstein predicted gravitational waves, but Heisenberg was uncertain about it.

59

REPLY

Keith Durant
Keith Durant
4 days ago
Yes gravitational waves are a prediction of general relativity though Einstein thought they would never be detectable.

16

REPLY

M O
M O
4 days ago
@Master Therion haha good one

8

REPLY

Volt Gene
Volt Gene
4 days ago
yup


REPLY

Rudy
Rudy
4 days ago
Lol yeah

1

REPLY

christian mccauley
christian mccauley
4 days ago
Sebastian Elytron yup


REPLY

404 Error Not Found
404 Error Not Found
4 days ago
Yes


REPLY

zer0Bot
zer0Bot
3 days ago
Yes and no, because it was thought that detecting gravitational waves was impossible.

1

REPLY

404 Error Not Found
404 Error Not Found
3 days ago
@zer0Bot Reality is independant from our ability to observe it.


REPLY

zer0Bot
zer0Bot
3 days ago
@404 Error Not Found Ok?


REPLY

404 Error Not Found
404 Error Not Found
3 days ago
@zer0Bot It was predicted, because it was thought to exist. The ability for humans to measure it is irrelevant to its predicted existence.

1

REPLY

Rudy
Rudy
3 days ago
Master Therion you sly SoB

1

REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
3 days ago
LIGO detected gravity wave from 1.3 billion years ago is a lie for more funding. Gravity is coexist with matters all the times,  it is continuing force therefore instantaneous. Gravity must be instantaneous, otherwise no planets can stay in stable orbit.


REPLY

Rudy
Rudy
3 days ago
Joe Chang hold up. You’re seriously saying that gravitational waves will break the speed of causality ? Cuz I will have to stop you there.

3

REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
3 days ago
@Rudy Forces are all instantaneous, inherited, immortal and indestructible.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
3 days ago
@Rudy Fundamental Forces

All matters are made from atoms, all atoms are made from charged particles.

Charged particles only carry electrostatic force, therefore all forces matters carried must be electrostatic force in nature. Same charges repel each other, opposite charges attract each other.

Coulomb's force and gravity are both accurate measured in labs, strong and weak force are imaginary, never can be measured or calculated.

From Coulomb's Law, we can calculate the universal repulsion force between matter 1 and matter 2 at distance R, which is the repulsion force between lines of sight electrons on the surface of matter 1 and matter 2. It is strong repulsion force F=Ke x q1q2/R^2.

How come matters still attract each other with gravity?

Because gravity is the net electrostatic force between charged particles between neutrally charged matters.

All positive charges in matter 1 attract all negative charges in matter 2 and repel all positive charges, all negative charges in matter 1 attract all positive charges in matter 2 and repel all negative charges.

Due to electrostatic force induction between neutrally charges matters, the net force is always a weak attraction force we called gravity F=G x m1m2/R^2.

Gravity causes matter formation, planet in orbit. Universal repulsion force causes all other nature phenomenon. Such as quantum entanglement, induction, photoelectric effect, electricity and light.
Read more

2

REPLY

404 Error Not Found
404 Error Not Found
3 days ago (edited)
@Joe Chang This is inherently false on many levels. To point out all of your errors and correct them would require more of my time than I'm willing to give. Your major flaws are in completely disregarding space-time, allowing the gravitational force to be instantaneous in nature, and claiming to understand the effects of quantum gravity. This creates many issues which you're simply disregarding in an attempt to contradict one of the most intelligent people to ever walk the planet. If you have some master hypnosis to dethrone the current understanding of reality then link me the papers which you've written describing this new physics. If you haven't then I recommend you go to university and study physics, with an open mind.
Read more

1

REPLY

404 Error Not Found
404 Error Not Found
3 days ago
@Rudy They don't, and unless he has a theory to explain all of reality then his claim has no ground to stand on. He even claims to understand the implications of gravity on a quantum level; Which if you didn't know, there's literally no physicist in the world which has a scientifically accepted explanation for quantum gravity.

1

REPLY

Rudy
Rudy
3 days ago (edited)
Joe Chang For starters, the concept of causality states the for any event x that requires event y to occur, then even y must occur earlier than x. And the speed of it is c (299,792,458 ms^-1). You May say that it is the speed of electromagnetic waves but before that it was proven to be the speed of causality by Einstein. What you are saying would have been considered true if dear ol’ Galileo was still alive who claimed the speed of light to be infinite. Now, if event y happens, event x cant happen before it is influenced by y at the speed of causality. Now if you’ll excuse me, I have work to do.
Read more

1

REPLY

Rudy
Rudy
3 days ago
404 Error Not Found welp, I wasted my time and tried to give the best explain action I could lol. Do please point out the faults if any.

1

REPLY

404 Error Not Found
404 Error Not Found
3 days ago
@Rudy Not a waste of time. Through the act of reasoning comes learning. You'll be happy to know that I'm pretty sure he's just a troll. I've found that he's posted the same comment on several threads with different explanations as to why everyone else is wrong and he is right. I highly recommend the channel PBS Spacetime if you'd like to learn more about physics. Start with their Playlist on relativity. They cover very advanced topics in an easy to understand format.
Read more

1

REPLY

Rudy
Rudy
3 days ago
404 Error Not Found You and I move on the same wavelength bro. I’ve been subscribed to them for like 6 months now and binged all their vids in like a month haha.

1

REPLY

Rudy
Rudy
3 days ago
404 Error Not Found Yeah bro ! It’s Rudy#8562

1

REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
3 days ago
@404 Error Not Found Einstein space -time is BS. Photoelectric effect is BS. If photon can knockout electron from solar cell, why can't photon accelerate solar wind? Standard model is BS, why protons in an atom stick together but electron and proton don't stick together? Are protons gays?


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
3 days ago
Einstein predicted the Sun's gravity bends light, the fact is plasma on the Sun bends light. Einstein theories are all BS.


REPLY

404 Error Not Found
404 Error Not Found
3 days ago
@Joe Chang We have literally observed this phenomenon Google it.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
3 days ago
@404 Error Not Found You read fake news and believe, that's all.


REPLY

404 Error Not Found
404 Error Not Found
3 days ago
@Joe Chang You spout nonsense garbage without any proof. Id love to read a paper of yours which you've presented to the scientific community. I guarantee you haven't written any because they'd be destroyed by the scientific community.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
3 days ago
Why all science forums banned my IP. Reddit blocked my question?

I asked 500 top physics professors the same question, not 1 reply, why?

https://www.reddit.com/r/AskPhysics/comments/anw1i9/i_think_i_discovered_a_new_force_how_do_you_think/

Because if the truth is out in public, that electromagnetism, relativity and QM are all BS, theoretical physicists will be laughed, Jobs lost, books burned?
Read more


REPLY

404 Error Not Found
404 Error Not Found
3 days ago
@Joe Chang How many papers have you written describing your hypnosis? I'm still waiting for an answer.


REPLY

404 Error Not Found
404 Error Not Found
3 days ago
@Joe Chang Where are the links to where you have posted them for review? If you haven't even written the your hypnosis down then no one should ever take you seriously.


REPLY

404 Error Not Found
404 Error Not Found
3 days ago
@Joe Chang You posted on reddit and got destroyed. The reason no one is answering you is because your claims aren't even worth the time it takes to reply. A post on redit isn't a scientific paper. If you want to be taken seriously then write a serious description of your physics in a paper at length and supply them to the scientific community. Baseless claims aren't science. I'm still waiting to see your paper


REPLY

404 Error Not Found
404 Error Not Found
3 days ago
@Joe Chang People have debonked what you've said and you won't accept it. How are people supposed to debit you when you won't even link a paper you've written?? Still don't have a link to one.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
3 days ago
@404 Error Not Found Universal Repulsion - a new fundamental force.

Similar to universal gravitation force between matters, there is an universal repulsion force between line of sight electrons on the surface of matters. Without gravitation, we cannot orbit the Sun. Without repulsion, Sun light cannot reach us.

Because electrons are on the surface of all matters, and because line of sight electrons are constantly repelling each other with Coulomb's force F=Ke x ee/R^2, therefore between the surfaces of matter A and matter B there exists an universal repulsion force F=Ke x aebe/R^2. In the equation, a is the number of line of sight electrons on the surface of mater A, b is the number of line of sight electrons on the surface of matter B, R is the average distance.

This universal repulsion force is always existing at any distance, therefore line of sight electrons are constantly connected by this force at any distance,  therefore they can share their kinetic energy instantaneously at any distance.

This universal repulsion force is the conductor of light energy in the vacuum space between stars and planets. Light energy is instantly shared between line of sight vibrating electrons on the surface of the Sun and electrons on Earth outer atmosphere, then it becomes light wave and traveling in the air at light speed C.

This universal repulsion force is the conductor of light between things you see and your eyes. Due to air in between, light speed is C.

This universal repulsion force is the conductor of EM wave between antenna and receiver. Due to air in between, EM wave speed is C.

Due to the existence of universal repulsion force, all star lights reach Earth outer atmosphere instantly, become light wave traveling in the air at speed C.

Sun light takes 8 minutes to reach us is mistaken. Time delay in space communication is impossible.

If light speed in vacuum space is infinite, relativity, electromagnetism and quantum physics will be all wrong.

Use MIT trillion frame per second camera to measure light speed inside of a vacuum glass bottle, we can prove light speed in vacuum is infinite.

Light only exists in air, water, medium/matter. There is no light in vacuum space.

Energy instantly teleported from the Sun to Earth outer atmosphere. Due to the existence of universal repulsion force between electrons on the sun and our outer atmosphere.

Einstein and Newton thought light is something traveling through space at light speed. It has both wave and particle properties. They were both wrong.

Newton and Einstein don't know what is light, what is its mechanism. That's why theoretical science is so wrong. There is no light wave or photon particle passing through space at light speed, light energy jumps from matter to matter instantaneous, becomes light wave moving in matter at light speed.
Read more


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
3 days ago
If you understood the mechanism of light, you will understand the Sun is not a fusion reactor.


REPLY

404 Error Not Found
404 Error Not Found
3 days ago (edited)
@Joe Chang   You're entire hypothesis is based on your idea that light travels at infinite speed in a vacuum. This is quite simply false. We have experimentally determined that lazers traveling through a vacume take time to get from. Point A to Point B. You're also completely neglecting the hubble space telescope which has accurately determined the speed of light based on the positions of juipiters moons. (I suggest you look that up). You also attempt to state that light doesn't exist in a vacume. This is false, if light didn't exist in a vacume then the camera which flew close to pluto wouldn't have been able to capture and image, because it was in a vacume. If light didn't exist in a vacume then light couldn't be generated in a vacume, but it can. All old fashioned light bulbs work in this manner. Until you have any experimental evidence to back your claims and until you manage to mathimatically prove why everyone else in the world is wrong than you won't be taken seriously. I should add that what you have listed can barely be considered a paper. You list no reasoning for previous theories to be wrong. You only state that they are. You don't list why light should travel at infinite speed you just say it does. Not to mention there's almost no mathematics. You have nothing to back your claim. Believing in your paper is about as logical as believing in the ' Flying Spaghetti Monster' religion.
Read more


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
2 days ago
@404 Error Not Found Light only exists within matter/medium. There is no light in space. I see you still don't understand the mechanism of light. Light is energy, energy must coexist with matter. Light speed has never measured in vacuum. The Jupiter moon delay was prediction. I asked MIT experts to measure light speed in vacuum glass bottle, they never reply. If Coulomb's force is real, repulsion force is real.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
2 days ago
@404 Error Not Found Light don't travel in space, only travel in matter/medium. Light wave is energy passing through matter produced mechanical wave. Without matter, there is no wave. Force speed is infinite, that's why light speed in space is infinite, that why gravity speed is infinite, that's why I said LIGO lied about detected gravity wave. Without force there is no motion, no energy, force is coexisted, inherited with matters, therefore force are instantaneous. It took me a long time to figured it out. Take your time, think, follow logic and PROVEN LAWS.
Read more


REPLY

404 Error Not Found
404 Error Not Found
2 days ago
@Joe Chang False again, what you're really saying is 'no one except me understands light'. This is ignorant and foolish of you. If light can't exist in a vacume then light couldn't be created in a vacume. We can measure the speed of light my placing a lazer in a vacume chamber with a detector on the other side. If light were instantaneous then the detector would instantly detect the lazer, but it doesn't. There is a finite amount of time it takes for the lazer to travel though the Vacume to reach the detector. Although this has been done before, I'm sure you've never conducted the experiment yourself. You've came to a conclusion without a reason, without and proof.
Read more


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
2 days ago
Nobel Prize is BS. Photoelectric effect is not fact. Gravity wave is not fact. Do you understand?


REPLY

404 Error Not Found
404 Error Not Found
2 days ago
@Joe Chang You don't understand any level of physics. I'm done wasting my time on you. You can feel free to be wrong with yourself.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
2 days ago
@404 Error Not Found I discovered repulsion force. Newton discovered gravity. Fact or not?


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
2 days ago
@404 Error Not Found Please debunk anything I said, I am a truth seeker.


REPLY

404 Error Not Found
404 Error Not Found
2 days ago
@Joe Chang Jesus christ old man you've discovered nothing. You're not a truth seeker. You're a guy who won't let go of a crazy fringe hypothesis based on no observation and no testing. There's nothing to falsify everything you've stated is already been falsified. We've directly measured the speed of light. We know light can be transferred and created through vacuum. We know that the transmission of light through vacuum takes a finite amount of time. Go to a university and ask these questions to a professor durring their office hours if you're interested in being told you're wrong again.
Read more


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
2 days ago
@404 Error Not Found Professor, I think I discovered a new force, how do you think? Thanks 
Add star  Joe Chang<oxivape@gmail.com> Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 6:01 PM
To: rmwa@uchicago.edu
Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original
Universal Repulsion - a new fundamental force.

Similar to universal gravitation force between matters, there is an
universal repulsion force between line of sight electrons on the
surface of matters. Without gravitation, we cannot orbit the Sun.
Without repulsion, Sun light cannot reach us.

Because electrons are on the surface of all matters, and because line
of sight electrons are constantly repelling each other with Coulomb's
force F=Ke x ee/R^2, therefore between the surfaces of matter A and
matter B there exists an universal repulsion force F=Ke x aebe/R^2. In
the equation, a is the number of line of sight electrons on the
surface of mater A, b is the number of line of sight electrons on the
surface of matter B, R is the average distance.

This universal repulsion force is always existing at any distance,
therefore line of sight electrons are constantly connected by this
force at any distance,  therefore they can share their kinetic energy
instantaneously at any distance.

This universal repulsion force is the conductor of light energy in the
vacuum space between stars and planets. Light energy is instantly
shared between line of sight vibrating electrons on the surface of the
Sun and electrons on Earth outer atmosphere, then it becomes light
wave and traveling in the air at light speed C.

This universal repulsion force is the conductor of light between
things you see and your eyes. Due to air in between, light speed is C.

This universal repulsion force is the conductor of EM wave between
antenna and receiver. Due to air in between, EM wave speed is C.

Due to the existence of universal repulsion force, all star lights
reach Earth outer atmosphere instantly, become light wave traveling in
the air at speed C.

Sun light takes 8 minutes to reach us is mistaken. Time delay in space
communication is impossible.

If light speed in vacuum space is infinite, relativity,
electromagnetism and quantum physics will be all wrong.

Use MIT trillion frame per second camera to measure light speed inside
of a vacuum glass bottle, we can prove light speed in vacuum is
infinite.

Light only exists in air, water, medium/matter. There is no light in
vacuum space.

Energy instantly teleported from the Sun to Earth outer atmosphere.
Due to the existence of universal repulsion force between electrons on
the sun and our outer atmosphere.

Einstein and Newton thought light is something traveling through space
at light speed. It has both wave and particle properties.

They were both wrong.
Read more


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
1 day ago
Light speed in vacuum is infinite to scientists is equal to their God is fake.

They must protect their fake God to survive.

That's why no scientists seriously measure light speed in vacuum or do double slit experiment in vacuum.

The modern physics is all based on light speed in vacuum is C.

Truth seekers must find a way to measure light speed in vacuum and show the result to the world.

It is hard, the establishment is huge.

I am fighting along, help me. Vote me 2020.
Read more


REPLY

Fuseteam
Fuseteam
1 day ago
@Joe Chang also if light speed were to be infinite MIT's trillion frame would not be able to see the light path, as it would be instantaneous, in fact it proves light speed must be finite or it would be unmeasurable


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
1 day ago
@Fuseteam No matter how long is the vacuum glass bottle, only need 1 frame to cover the missing light inside.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
1 day ago
@Fuseteam Try to hold a strong magnet in each hand, same poles face each other, feel the repulsion force?

Now wave 1 hand, does energy instantly jumped to other hand?

Electrostatic force is 10^33 times strong than magnetic force. It has infinite range.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
1 day ago
@Fuseteam Forces are coexist with matters, always there, never stop, indestructible and immortal, therefore forces have no speed, forces are instantaneous through out the universe.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
22 hours ago
Pressure, friction, attraction and repulsion, all forces are coexisting with matters, all forces are instantaneous, only matter's motion caused by force has limited speed, due to F=ma.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
21 hours ago
Joe Chang
4 months ago
Light is electromotive force carried by oscillating electrons. Light must co-exist with matter. Therefore there is no light in vacuum space. All the light/EM wave is within air/matter.

All matter consists of atoms in motion and these in turn consist of positively charged protons surrounded by a cloud of negatively charged electrons. The vibrating motion of the atoms causes the cloud of electrons to oscillate and this oscillation generates electromagnetic radiation.

All lines of sight matters attract each other with gravity F=G x m1m2/rr. Electrons are on the surface of all matters.

All lines of sight electrons in space repel each other with electrostatic force F=Ke x ee/rr. That force is the conductor of light/electromagnetic radiation.

That force is co-exist with matter, is inherited, is immortal and indestructible. Therefore light speed in vacuum space is infinite/instantaneous no mater any distance.

We can measure light speed in a vacuum glass bottle by using this tool to prove light speed in vacuum is infinite. Can you do it? I commented on that MIT video, emailed to the inventor and their team. No reply at all. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y_9vd4HWlVA
Read more


REPLY

M O
M O
14 hours ago
@Joe Chang you seem to know pretty much about this topic but while reading your comments one after another I slowly realized what BS you are onto here. Conspiracy theories have poisended your mind my friend.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
14 hours ago
@M O can you debunk anything?


REPLY

Fuseteam
Fuseteam
30 minutes ago
@Joe Chang it's several frames just look it up it was one frame we wouldn't have a vide in fact we wouldn't be able to see the light "moving" at all, instead we get a video


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
26 minutes ago
@Fuseteam What's your point? Should MIT or any scientists measure light speed in vacuum to find out truth? Do you agreed now that light speed in vacuum is infinite?


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
17 minutes ago
Did you tried to feel force? What's its speed?


REPLY

Pixie Fairy
Pixie Fairy
4 days ago
Yo mama so fat, LIGO detects when she sits down.

300

REPLY

Hide replies
 Asoosy_infinity 1
Asoosy_infinity 1
4 days ago
Lol

4

REPLY

Hollow
Hollow
4 days ago
lmao

4

REPLY

Marco Aurélio Lima do Nascimento Junior
Marco Aurélio Lima do Nascimento Junior
4 days ago
that's pure gold

5

REPLY

Fuseteam
Fuseteam
4 days ago
more like Yo mama so skinny, even LIGO can't detect her

9

REPLY

Adymn Sani
Adymn Sani
4 days ago
You joked about this but it is precisely the reason that LIGO can't and doesn't do what they claim and is a gross example of science spending money they don't have on projects just to get published.  Another project example is the desired upgrade to the LHC.  These physicists must publish or go extinct along with their source of personal income if they don't continually attempt to remain relevant sort of like celebrities that don't do anything of added value.
Read more

3

REPLY

Rabbit Piet
Rabbit Piet
4 days ago
Fuseteam but seriously the way the experiment is set up is one in which it be very hard to detect most people elephants, cars,planets etc.


REPLY

Ian Meade
Ian Meade
4 days ago
@Adymn Sani good to know that LIGO is all just a hoax because fat people sit near it and sabotage the data. I think you might just be a tad bit special if you think that the presence of one person can distort the the gravitational waves of a neutron star merger, corroborated with visual observation. And yes I understand how the proximity causes the persons gravity to have more immediate influence, but they have nowhere near the widespread affect and predictable timing that LIGO observes. Also research grants aren't something scientists live off of, they cover the cost of an experiment and nothing else.
Read more

12

REPLY

Subhomoy Ganguly
Subhomoy Ganguly
4 days ago
Comment of the month

2

REPLY

Nocturno
Nocturno
3 days ago
I feel like I just got shot by a bazzoka


REPLY

Karl Miller
Karl Miller
3 days ago
Pixie Fairy your an ass🤣


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
3 days ago
LIGO detected gravity wave from 1.3 billion years ago is a lie for more funding. Gravity is coexist with matters all the times,  it is continuing force therefore instantaneous. Gravity must be instantaneous, otherwise no planets can stay in stable orbit.

3

REPLY

Kenneth Hicks
Kenneth Hicks
3 days ago (edited)
@Adymn Sani Maybe sometimes but mostly not.  Some of us are truly curious and are  fortunate if/when it benefits humanity.  Pretty sure Aristotle, Newton, Faraday, Maxwell, Einstein and many many thousands of others wasn't doing it to just get published and make a buck.  Copernicus comes to mind...

5

REPLY

Spring Bloom
Spring Bloom
3 days ago
@Adymn Sani


YES! Thats exactly what I was going to say.


REPLY

Spring Bloom
Spring Bloom
3 days ago
@Kenneth Hicks

Aristotle and Newton were both shameless self-promoters, who lived off patronage of their work. In other words, they did it for the fame and money.


REPLY

OverlordShamala
OverlordShamala
3 days ago
@Adymn Sani The above video failed to mention of the 3rd interferometer built with French-Italian collaboration called VIRGO & located at Pisa Italy. That's how all three confirmed an event on August 2017, triangulating the source of an event. Followed by the observation of a burst of gamma rays made by the Gamma-ray Burst Monitor on NASA’s Fermi space telescope at that site of the event space.

Physicist do things which are valuable  & is relevant, some discoveries will be more relevant in the future as it adds more misunderstanding for future generation.Its hard to claim that a physicist are celebrities, the average person basically don't know about them & their works. Electricity was known in ancient times & was understood in the early 1600, it was mostly a parlor tricks before someone figured out they could derive a use for them. first used to communicate long distance (telegraph) & later on as a light source (discovery of the light bulb).

Hard to say what his discoveries will lead to, but what are you trying to achieve arguing for willful ignorance?
Read more

1

REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
3 days ago
@OverlordShamala If LIGO detected gravity wave from 1.3 billions years away, why can't LIGO detect CME or Earth quake? It is all BS.


REPLY

OverlordShamala
OverlordShamala
3 days ago
@Joe Chang So to speak, gravity does "coexist with matter", but gravity will do what it will do. And gravity (not gravity itself) waves do travel at the speed of lights. But why do you think the planet's orbits will not stay stable?

I'm bad at analogies but here it goes: Imagine gravity as the surface of a pond, it's everywhere... toss a pebble & you will see its the ripple that travels in a certain speed.
Read more


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
3 days ago
@OverlordShamala Forces are all instantaneous, force acts as mass less stiff rod that connects matters in one.


REPLY

OverlordShamala
OverlordShamala
3 days ago
@Joe Chang Forces are not all instantaneous, & there are not "rods" connecting matter as one. If these forces were instantaneous, range finders using lasers would not work for example. Host would not be able to bleep out insults when callers would call in a radio show🤗.

The Universe wasn't made to revolve around your or much less meet your expectations.

Chang, if you are using an apps translator to translate your language to English, I suggest you stop. Its doing a bad job at it, its fails to peak up nuances words may have in particular language.
Read more


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
3 days ago
@OverlordShamala Universal Repulsion - a new fundamental force.

Similar to universal gravitation force between matters, there is an universal repulsion force between line of sight electrons on the surface of matters. Without gravitation, we cannot orbit the Sun. Without repulsion, Sun light cannot reach us.

Because electrons are on the surface of all matters, and because line of sight electrons are constantly repelling each other with Coulomb's force F=Ke x ee/R^2, therefore between the surfaces of matter A and matter B there exists an universal repulsion force F=Ke x aebe/R^2. In the equation, a is the number of line of sight electrons on the surface of mater A, b is the number of line of sight electrons on the surface of matter B, R is the average distance.

This universal repulsion force is always existing at any distance, therefore line of sight electrons are constantly connected by this force at any distance,  therefore they can share their kinetic energy instantaneously at any distance.

This universal repulsion force is the conductor of light energy in the vacuum space between stars and planets. Light energy is instantly shared between line of sight vibrating electrons on the surface of the Sun and electrons on Earth outer atmosphere, then it becomes light wave and traveling in the air at light speed C.

This universal repulsion force is the conductor of light between things you see and your eyes. Due to air in between, light speed is C.

This universal repulsion force is the conductor of EM wave between antenna and receiver. Due to air in between, EM wave speed is C.

Due to the existence of universal repulsion force, all star lights reach Earth outer atmosphere instantly, become light wave traveling in the air at speed C.

Sun light takes 8 minutes to reach us is mistaken. Time delay in space communication is impossible.

If light speed in vacuum space is infinite, relativity, electromagnetism and quantum physics will be all wrong.

Use MIT trillion frame per second camera to measure light speed inside of a vacuum glass bottle, we can prove light speed in vacuum is infinite.

Light only exists in air, water, medium/matter. There is no light in vacuum space.

Energy instantly teleported from the Sun to Earth outer atmosphere. Due to the existence of universal repulsion force between electrons on the sun and our outer atmosphere.

Einstein and Newton thought light is something traveling through space at light speed. It has both wave and particle properties. They were both wrong.

Newton and Einstein don't know what is light, what is its mechanism. That's why theoretical science is so wrong. There is no light wave or photon particle passing through space at light speed, light energy jumps from matter to matter instantaneous, becomes light wave moving in matter at light speed.
Read more


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
3 days ago
@OverlordShamala Fundamental Forces

All matters are made from atoms, all atoms are made from charged particles.

Charged particles only carry electrostatic force, therefore all forces matters carried must be electrostatic force in nature. Same charges repel each other, opposite charges attract each other.

Coulomb's force and gravity are both accurate measured in labs, strong and weak force are imaginary, never can be measured or calculated.

From Coulomb's Law, we can calculate the universal repulsion force between matter 1 and matter 2 at distance R, which is the repulsion force between lines of sight electrons on the surface of matter 1 and matter 2. It is strong repulsion force F=Ke x q1q2/R^2.

How come matters still attract each other with gravity?

Because gravity is the net electrostatic force between charged particles between neutrally charged matters.

All positive charges in matter 1 attract all negative charges in matter 2 and repel all positive charges, all negative charges in matter 1 attract all positive charges in matter 2 and repel all negative charges.

Due to electrostatic force induction between neutrally charges matters, the net force is always a weak attraction force we called gravity F=G x m1m2/R^2.

Gravity causes matter formation, planet in orbit. Universal repulsion force causes all other nature phenomenon. Such as quantum entanglement, induction, photoelectric effect, electricity and light.
Read more


REPLY

OverlordShamala
OverlordShamala
3 days ago
@Joe Chang Like I said, the Universe wasn't made to fulfill your expectations, wasn't made to do what you want it to do.

I'm not sure by your magical "repulsion force" you are inferring the new discovery coined "dark energy" because it is not know. But you seem to have given it magical qualities that it does whatever you wish it to do.

The realities of this universe show you are completely wrong.

"Light only exists in air, water, medium/matter. There is no light in vacuum space." That is a genuine cow-dung statement you said.
Read more


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
3 days ago
@OverlordShamala Surely there is no light in vacuum space. Shine a red laser passing through a vacuum glass bottle, the red beam will disappear inside of the bottle. Light waves only exist within a medium, energy must coexist with matter. There is no dark energy, no black holes, no big bang but big fart.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
3 days ago
@OverlordShamala Repulsion force is as real as gravity, as real as electrostatic force, both accurately measured in the labs. Not like fake strong and weak force that can never be measured or calculated.


REPLY

OverlordShamala
OverlordShamala
3 days ago (edited)
@Joe Chang I discovered you posting the same constipated cow-dung on a site called "Fucked Science". Posting the same thing about things you don't understand.

You are cherry-picking words that you think sound cool. Never mind the real meaning of them. And you haphazardly cobbling these words together in an incredible nonsense of cow manure. Posting your cow-dung on YouTube doesn't constitute evidence.
Read more

1

REPLY

OverlordShamala
OverlordShamala
3 days ago
@Joe Chang Heck, it seems you are using your earlier postings on "Fucked Science" to copy your comments over there to paste them over here on YouTube. How pathetic is that?


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
3 days ago
@OverlordShamala Theoretical physics is really fucked up if light speed in space is infinite, agree?


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
3 days ago
@OverlordShamala Do you understand the mechanism of light yet?


REPLY

OverlordShamala
OverlordShamala
3 days ago
@Joe Chang Reality says light speed travel travels @ 186,000per mile or 300,000 km per second in a vacuum. The speed of light is not infinite. Theoretical physics never claimed light speed id infinite, you did.


REPLY

OverlordShamala
OverlordShamala
3 days ago
@Joe Chang Let say I don't know the mechanism of light, for the sake of this example. You are the person I will definitely NOT go to & ask.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
3 days ago
@OverlordShamala The latest time measured light speed in air was 1926. Never measured in vacuum yet. I asked MIT experts to measure it, they never reply.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
3 days ago
500 top professors around the world, not one answered my question about universal repulsion force, what's the odds?


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
2 days ago
If you don't believe me, ask best scientists or science forums you can find, see what happens.


REPLY

OverlordShamala
OverlordShamala
2 days ago (edited)
@Joe Chang I have ask best scientists or science forums & nothing happened. They answer my questions or clarify if I have misunderstood something, and some cases they honestly say they don't know regarding mysteries that are yet to be explored. That's all that happens.

The most likely case is that you did not ask any scientist. You are just concocting a fairy tale for your own amusement.
Read more


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
2 days ago
@OverlordShamala Cool, may truth be with you.


REPLY

OverlordShamala
OverlordShamala
2 days ago
​@Joe Chang It is easier for me to believe that you did not ask any 500 top professors around the word, and you did not make any questions at all. Your just concocting a conspiracy in regards of your magical word "universal repulsion force".

I've asked 500,000 top professors around the world and they told me you are full of it.
Read more


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
2 days ago
Discover truth is not hard, make people to accept it is HARD.


REPLY

OverlordShamala
OverlordShamala
2 days ago
@Joe Chang I thought you were going to be gone, now you are going to start complaining like an old woman?


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
2 days ago
@OverlordShamala isn't Reddit blocked my question about repulsion force? I did emailed top 500 physics professors, my Gmail sent mail can prove.


REPLY

OverlordShamala
OverlordShamala
2 days ago (edited)
@Joe Chang You are the one making the claim, that means you are the one who must provide evidence, or at least a mathematical theorem to formulate a model that can be eventually tested. Not a badly worded essay posted on YouTube, your essays are not evidence of any kind.

But, your model should not be in conflict with well established facts. I've already  read your wiliness to state that space explorations, which is something everyone can verify and see, as just a hoax because you don't want your magical "universal repulsion force" is totally wrong and just simply another slop of cow-dung you call posted on YouTube.
Read more


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
2 days ago
@OverlordShamala If repulsion force is wrong, why Reddit blocked my question? Why 500 professors not one reply? If Coulomb's force and gravity are fact, repulsion force must be fact. Do you understand? Do you agree?


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
2 days ago
@OverlordShamala Professor, I think I discovered a new force, how do you think? Thanks 
Add star  Joe Chang<oxivape@gmail.com> Fri, Feb 8, 2019 at 6:03 PM
To: liantaow@uchicago.edu
Reply | Reply to all | Forward | Print | Delete | Show original
Universal Repulsion - a new fundamental force.

Similar to universal gravitation force between matters, there is an
universal repulsion force between line of sight electrons on the
surface of matters. Without gravitation, we cannot orbit the Sun.
Without repulsion, Sun light cannot reach us.

Because electrons are on the surface of all matters, and because line
of sight electrons are constantly repelling each other with Coulomb's
force F=Ke x ee/R^2, therefore between the surfaces of matter A and
matter B there exists an universal repulsion force F=Ke x aebe/R^2. In
the equation, a is the number of line of sight electrons on the
surface of mater A, b is the number of line of sight electrons on the
surface of matter B, R is the average distance.

This universal repulsion force is always existing at any distance,
therefore line of sight electrons are constantly connected by this
force at any distance,  therefore they can share their kinetic energy
instantaneously at any distance.

This universal repulsion force is the conductor of light energy in the
vacuum space between stars and planets. Light energy is instantly
shared between line of sight vibrating electrons on the surface of the
Sun and electrons on Earth outer atmosphere, then it becomes light
wave and traveling in the air at light speed C.

This universal repulsion force is the conductor of light between
things you see and your eyes. Due to air in between, light speed is C.

This universal repulsion force is the conductor of EM wave between
antenna and receiver. Due to air in between, EM wave speed is C.

Due to the existence of universal repulsion force, all star lights
reach Earth outer atmosphere instantly, become light wave traveling in
the air at speed C.

Sun light takes 8 minutes to reach us is mistaken. Time delay in space
communication is impossible.

If light speed in vacuum space is infinite, relativity,
electromagnetism and quantum physics will be all wrong.

Use MIT trillion frame per second camera to measure light speed inside
of a vacuum glass bottle, we can prove light speed in vacuum is
infinite.

Light only exists in air, water, medium/matter. There is no light in
vacuum space.

Energy instantly teleported from the Sun to Earth outer atmosphere.
Due to the existence of universal repulsion force between electrons on
the sun and our outer atmosphere.

Einstein and Newton thought light is something traveling through space
at light speed. It has both wave and particle properties.

They were both wrong.
Read more


REPLY

OverlordShamala
OverlordShamala
2 days ago
@Joe Chang Not getting the answer you want to your question is not blocking.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
2 days ago
You should be appreciate someone showed you the mechanism of light. Don't hate the messenger.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
2 days ago
If light speed in vacuum is infinite is fact, accepted by the science community, NASA, CERN, LIGO etc will lost fund, many scientists will lost job, many textbooks will be burned, a revolution will change the world.


REPLY

OverlordShamala
OverlordShamala
2 days ago
@Joe Chang LOL 😂🤣


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
2 days ago
Why don't MIT use their 10 trillion frame per second camera technology to measure light speed in vacuum? It is most important speed in physics. They used 1 trillion frame per second tech show off light passing through a bottle at low speed. I believe those 500 professors understood my theory is correct, they just forgot how to react. How come it is so simple, so obvious, but I couldn't see it earlier?


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
2 days ago
I was very sad and disappointed. 500 not one reply. Like the Bible said, not one righteous man in town.


REPLY

Kenneth Hicks
Kenneth Hicks
2 days ago
@Spring Bloom I feel sorry for you and your outlook on stuff, hope you get better


REPLY

Spring Bloom
Spring Bloom
2 days ago
@Kenneth Hicks

I don't feel sorry for you, your ignorance is wilful.


REPLY

Kenneth Hicks
Kenneth Hicks
2 days ago
@Spring Bloom See, that says volumes about you doesn't it?


REPLY

Spring Bloom
Spring Bloom
2 days ago
@Kenneth Hicks

It says virtually nothing about me.


REPLY

Kenneth Hicks
Kenneth Hicks
2 days ago
@Spring Bloom I disagree


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
2 days ago
Nothing, no stars, no energy or matter is existing in the past or the future.

All things are existing in the forever ongoing now.

Look at faraway stars is not look at past .

All stars we see are only existing at now.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
2 days ago
Try to hold a strong magnet in each hand, same poles face each other, feel the repulsion force?

Now wave 1 hand, does energy instantly jumped to other hand?
Gravity instantly jumped over space the same way, LIGO indeed lied.

Repulsion force is 10^33 times stronger than magnetic force. It has infinite range.

Energy is the motive force matter carried, energy must coexist with matter, charges or plasma.

Energy is continuing and instantaneous in space, moving in medium/matter at light speed.
Read more


REPLY

Spring Bloom
Spring Bloom
2 days ago
@Joe Chang

Incorrect. Everything exists, only in the past.  We 8nhabit a 4 dimensional construct. The 3 dimensions of Space are fully expanded and flat, so that we may navigate them at will. The 4th dimension of Time, is highly curved and still unfolding, so that we are embedded in the wavefront, moving along with it, in the direction of its unfolding. We cannot see ahead or laterally, because there is nothing ahead or laterally. We can only see behind, where everything has already happened. We are all Schrödinger's Cat.
Read more


REPLY

Spring Bloom
Spring Bloom
2 days ago
@Kenneth Hicks

Your agreement is nonrequisite and irrelevant.

1

REPLY

Kenneth Hicks
Kenneth Hicks
2 days ago
@Spring Bloom Lol


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
2 days ago
@Spring Bloom dimension is man made concept. time is not physical matter, cannot be curved. past and future only exist in our minds. all past became now, all future will become now. the whole universe is existing at forever ongoing now.


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
1 day ago
Light speed in vacuum is infinite to scientists is equal to their God is fake.

They must protect their fake God to survive.

That's why no scientists seriously measure light speed in vacuum or do double slit experiment in vacuum.

The modern physics is all based on light speed in vacuum is C.

Truth seekers must find a way to measure light speed in vacuum and show the result to the world.

It is hard, the establishment is huge.

I am fighting along, help me. Vote me 2020.
Read more


REPLY

Fuseteam
Fuseteam
1 day ago
@Rabbit Piet depends on how well they managed to cancel out the noise to be honest


REPLY

Fuseteam
Fuseteam
1 day ago
@Joe Chang so but light speed cannot be infinite, for one saying it is infinite wouild mean it is unmeasurable, but assuming it is;  anything anywhere in the universe would be able to affect anything else instantly; which would mean there is no cause and effect which would mean nothing would exists....
even if the speed of light is not C is it and has to be finite for anything to exist, as the speed of light is not about light but about causation
Read more


REPLY

Fuseteam
Fuseteam
1 day ago
@Adymn Sani in a sense i can see that being a issue tbh, if they are not discovering to gathering data they certainly would not have an income. and we as onlookers cannot confirm or deny what they claim in either case as we cannot observe what they do not can we "analyse" of their data is garbage or not. but yeah i suppose you are right they need to publish something for their living


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
1 day ago
@Fuseteam Only matter has speed, force and energy are not matter, are coexisted with matter, therefore instantaneous. Simple fact, too simple, smart people over looked.


REPLY

Fuseteam
Fuseteam
31 minutes ago
@Joe Chang enerfy has a constant speed: the speed of light, i agree a force cannot act on energy but only on matter, this is why matter has acceleration while energy does not. you "can't accelerate energy" but you can "use energy to accelerate matter"
in that sense the speed of light aka the speed of cause and effect is the speed of energy.......... this speed doesn't change ever this in and of itself is also an incomplete statement and does not make complete sense at all
Read more


REPLY

Joe Chang
Joe Chang
24 minutes ago
@Fuseteam Only moving matters have speed. energy and force have no speed, but must coexist with matter.


REPLY