## Wednesday, December 13, 2017

Force has infinite speed. Force act upon matters constantly at any distance. Forces coexist with the matter at all the time.

Only moving matter/mass has speed. Time has no speed, only timer's movement has speed.

Only matter can be moved, curved, compressed or expend. Time and space both have no physical existence.

Einstein theories are all based on false assumptions and misinterpretations.

The force between lines of sight matters is instantaneous, such as gravity between stars, the force between lines of sight charged particles.

All forces are coexisting with matters, therefore instantaneous.

Force passes through matter/medium has limited speed, such as oscillating electric force/light passes through air or water becoming em wave.

Without a medium, there is no wave. Sunlight/radiant energy instantly transfer energy to electrons on earth outer atmosphere, becomes light wave and passes through the atmosphere to reach us.

Matter, has mass, can never move at infinite speed. therefore teleportation is impossible science fiction.

Put a magnet in each hand, the same pole faces each other, feel the tension? what's its speed?

If you move one hand, what do you feel the other hand?  Is emf instantly transferred in opposite direction? Replace magnets with electrons, that is the mechanism of all em phenomena.

## Tuesday, December 12, 2017

To see the universe from an atom, give you logo pieces, you can build all kinds of toys.

HOW ATOMS ARE FORMED

1 electron carries 1 negative charge.

If we smash the electron into 1000000 equal pieces, each piece will carry 1/1000000 negative charge. Let's call it enertron.

Since enertrons carry the same negative charge, they repel each other.

If we have a perfect bottle, which means no leakage, no react, like glass bottle to air.

We put 1000000 enertrons into the perfect bottle. since enertrons repel each other, they put a pressure on the bottle wall. let's measure and call that pressure 1 volt.

If we put 8000000 enertrons into the same bottle, the pressure on the wall should be 4 volt.

Now if 1 enertron is moving or vibrating, the rest all enertrons will be energized.

That is the mechanism of light/quantum/em wave.

Now if we put 1 positive charge into the perfect bottle, what will happen?

The enertrons should be attracted by the positive charge and form a ball around it, the closer to the positive charge the denser enertron cloud. the density of the enertron is decay at 1/rrr due to the repulsion force between enertrons decay at 1/rr.

Now image enertron is the real thing, it carries a tiny negative charge, something like 1/10^33 electron charge, but it has a stronger force field, similar to neodymium magnet compare with a ceramic magnet.

Image proton actually carries 918 positive charges, it attracted 917 total charges of enertrons formed a solid ball, 1 electron attached to the ball to form a neutrally charged hydrogen atom. 1 atomic weight equals to 1936 total charges, no matter positive or negative charges.

This is the realistic atomic structure. the electrons are constantly vibrating on the plane at 90 degrees to the atom radius due to the kinetic energy it carries.

Atoms are solid balls, that's why the matter is not compressible.

If atoms are constructed as science told you, 99.99% empty space, why matter is not compressible? electron shell/wave/cloud/orbital are negatively charged, they do not stick to positive changed nuclear is a magic, how can they stand any force/impact/reaction without crashing?

Why is energy conserved?

If you put a moving force on any enerctrons in the perfect bottle, that emf is spreading to all the lines of sight enertrons instantly by the repulsion force between them f=Ke x ee/rr, they all are moving now, and cannot stop ever.

Do we have a perfect bottle?

Yes, every atom is a perfect bottle. all matters are a perfect bottle. atom's binding force locked charged particles within it, energy has nowhere to go but bounce within and between matters.

The forces f=Ke x e1e2/rr and f=G x m1m2/rr are like perfect springs between matters, connected all matters in 1 at all the time.

MAGNETISM

2 parallel wires at r distance, the free electrons in the 2 wires repel each other with force f=Ke x q1q2/rr, that force is the conductor of energy/moving electric force/emf. that force act as a class 1 lever with the fulcrum at the center, the mechanical advantage is equal to 1.

If electrons move in wire 1, electrons in wire 2 will instantly induce an opposite direction emf. the true mechanism of electromagnetic induction. similar to momentum conservation.

Every magnetic atom/magton contains 2 atoms. 2 atoms of a ferromagnetic matter before magnetize, we put it as 00. if 1 electron moved from 1 atom to the other atom and stays there as -11, the 2 atoms become a magton, it carries a special property now, we call it magnetic force.

-11, -22, -33...-nn are all magton but carry different magnetic force strength.

2 magtons attract each other in the direction -11><-11, and repel each other in the direction -11<>1-1 or 1-1<>-11.

Use copper wire winding around an iron core, put a current, the electrons in the wire move in circles around the core, make atoms in the core arrange into -11-11 directions all the way around the core. on the pole plane area, magtons are arranged as clockwise concentric circles of -11-11 directions, north pole.

Reverse the current direction, the pole plane area magtons are arranged in counterclockwise concentric circles of -11-11 directions, south pole.

So, a magnet north pole stored clockwise electric force, south pole stored counterclockwise electric force. the same poles always repel, different poles always attract.

There is only 1 force exists, coulomb force f=Ke x pq/rr. Gravity and magnetic force are both different configurations of electric force.

Without matters, there is no force. A single matter has no force. Force can only exist between matters.

Without a test body, where is the electric or magnetic force? where is gravity force?

The mysteries of the universe are within 2 equations.

f=Ke x e1e1/rr and f=G x m1m2/rr.

Those 2 forces rule everything existing.

The mechanism of quantum entanglement is simple. the force in between any 2 charged particles f=Ke x qp/rr is the conductor of energy/information/moving electric force. it is an invisible physical rod with zero mass that always connected 2 particles as 1. if 1 particle is energized, that energy instantly transferred to another. from f=ma, m=0, so energy instantly moved from 1 particle to another. Science called it quantum entanglement.

GRAVITY

Gravity is induced electrical attraction force between neutrally charged masses/matters. Similar to sexual attraction between married couples and married couples.

The greatest 2 physics laws tell the secret already.

f=Ke x q1q2/rr and f=G x m1m2/rr both forces decay at 1/rr must have same nature.

The matter is condensed charged particles, a matter's mass equals to total charged particles it carries. without charged particles, there is no mass/matter. Without charged particles, there is no force.

LIGHT

Light is vibrating electric force carried by vibrating electrons on atoms. F=Ke x ee/rr is the conductor of light energy/em wave/quantum.

ENERGY

Energy is electromotive force carrier by moving/accelerating charge/mass.

## Monday, December 11, 2017

No book or scientist had a clear definition of energy. the capacity to do work? what is it? word puzzle?

Electrons change energy level to emit photons? the electron has what capacity to do work? how electron carries such capacity to do work? do what work? how?

Even Einstein admitted he knows shit about what are light quanta/quantum/energy/em wave.

What is energy? potential energy, kinetic energy, chemical energy, nuclear energy, solar, wind, wave, fuel?

No, the matter is the source/container/carrier of energy.

Energy is emf, electromotive force, moving force, carried by moving matter/charge.

All matters, are connected by gravity and repulsion force between electrons on their surface atoms, at all the times.

The sun attracted earth, surface electrons on the sun repel lines of sight surface electrons in our outer atmosphere, with the force f=Ke x ee/rr. that force is the conductor of radiant energy/light/emf.

Electrons in the sun vibrate under heat energy, the emf transfer to earth electrons instantly through that force. we call it light/em wave/radiant energy.

Energy must exist with/within matter.  no matter what energy you are searching, find it from moving/vibrating matter.

Every atom inherited its own binding energy, opposite charges attract each other like a magnet attracts iron ball. they collide together to form atom and produce heat/thermal energy.

The more atoms condensed together under gravity, the more energy stored in the mass, the higher temperature. all suns' energy is from star formation.

All energy is shared by all matter, depend on their mass. energy and matter both conserved/immortal, there is no heat death.

If heat can radiate into space, the earth will be as hot as the sun, the whole universe will be at the same temperature, due to thermal equilibrium.

If heat cannot radiate into space, why all the energy we produced/used from the past didn't make the earth warmer?

Very good question.

If you have a channel between a pond and ocean, the water level will be the same.

If rained 10 foot in the pond slowly, the water level will not raise at all. both in the pond and ocean.

The repulsion force between lines of sight electrons on surface atoms of masses/matters, f=Ke x ee/rr is the water channel, thermal energy is water, mass is the water container.

Nuclear energy is atom's inner binding energy, chemical energy is atom's outer binding energy.

Atoms are not 99.99% empty space. not as present science told.

## Sunday, November 26, 2017

All atomic structure theories, standard or Bohr model, are total bs.

The attraction force between opposite charges is the strongest force in the universe, there is no possibility that electrons able to circle/wave/cloud around the protons, to form a stable atom.

All science based on that model is false.

We can hardly separate two strong magnets, how nature makes electrons not stick to protons all the times?

What is the uncertainty principle? it is certain that there is only an attraction force between oppositely charged particles in every atom. it is uncertain how they don't stick together at all times.

Wave-particle duality? How electrons wave? What's the precise mechanism?

All things must have a precise mechanism.

Remember God doesn't play dice?

Do you really understand how atoms are formed or just read and believe?

HOW ATOMS ARE FORMED

1 electron carries 1 negative charge.

If we split the electron into 1000000 equal pieces, each piece will carry 1/1000000 negative charge. Let's call it enertron.

If we have a perfect bottle, which means no leakage, no react, like a glass bottle to air.

We put 1000000 enertrons into the perfect bottle. since enertrons repel each other with Coulomb's force. Now if 1 enertron is moving or vibrating, the rest all enertrons will be energized.

That is the mechanism of light.

Now if we put 1 positive charge into the perfect bottle, what will happen?

The enertrons should be attracted by the positive charge and form a ball around it, the closer to the positive charge the denser enertron cloud. the density of the enertron is decay at 1/R^3 due to the repulsion force between enertrons decay at 1/R^2.

Now image enertron is the real thing, it carries a tiny negative charge, something like 1/10^33 electron charge, but it has a stronger force field, similar to neodymium magnet compare with a ceramic magnet.

Image proton actually carries 918 positive charges, it attracted 917 total charges of enertrons formed a solid ball, 1 electron attached to the ball to form a neutrally charged hydrogen atom. 1 atomic weight equals to 1936 total charges, no matter positive or negative charges.

This is the realistic atomic structure. the electron is constantly vibrating at radius direction due to the kinetic energy atom carried.

Atoms are solid balls, that's why the matter is not compressible.

If atoms are constructed as science told you, 99.99% empty space, why the matter is not compressible? electron shell/wave/cloud/orbital are negatively charged, they do not stick to positive changed nuclear is a magic, how can they stand any force/impact/reaction without crashing?

Why is energy conserved?

If you put a moving force on any enerctrons in the perfect bottle, that emf will be spreading to all the lines of sight enertrons instantly by the repulsion force between them F=Ke x ee/R^2, they all are moving now, and cannot stop ever.

Do we have a perfect bottle?

Yes, every atom is a perfect bottle/perpetual machine. all matters are a perfect bottle. atom's binding force locked charged particles within it, energy has nowhere to go but bounce within and between matters.

The forces F=Ke x e1e2/R^2 and F=G x m1m2/R^2 are like perfect springs between matters, connected all matters in 1.

I don't have the equips, but I know the theory is correct.

Light is not particle nor wave in vacuum space.

Light is electrons vibration force.

the double slit is the most famous experiment in history.

the first one to renew it will rewrite history.

unless you have no equips and basic knowledge, don't miss the opportunity in a lifetime.

Do you want to win a Nobel Prize?

## Saturday, November 25, 2017

all scientists think light is photon/em wave/particle that travels at light speed in the vacuum space.

they don't know there is no light in vacuum space, or light speed is infinite in space. because they don't know the cause/mechanism of light.

2 electrons at distance r, repel each other with a force f=Ke x ee/rr.

that force acts like a physical rod between the two electrons, if 1 electron is moving, the emf force will instantly transfer to the other electron at opposite direction, this is the true mechanism of light/em wave/radiant energy.

the sun is not an active nuclear reactor, the sun is not shooting out energy to space, it only shares energy with matters surround. sun's energy is from star formation.

energy cannot leak/vanish into space, energy can only exist within matter.

matter and energy are both immortal, space has no boundary, time has no beginning or end, time is forever ongoing now, existence is immortal.

but who we are? what we become?

gravity and magnetic force are both electrical force in different configuration.

gravity is induced attraction force between neutrally charged masses/matters.

magnetic force is circular electrical force carried by magnetic matter or current.

all based on f=Ke x pq/rr, coulomb force rules the universe.

there is only 1 force, coulomb's force, f=Ke x pq/rr.

gravity is induced electric attraction force between neutrally charged matters.

magnetic force is circular electrical force.

strong and wake forces are misinterpretation of electrical force between charged particles.

magnetic field = circular electric field

magnetic field direction perpendicular to electric field direction

electric field strength decay at 1/rr, due to f=Ke x pq/rr law.

magnetic field strength decay at 1/rrr, why?

i haven't figured it out.

any clues?

Interesting discussing:

No one can answer how 1 electron and 1 proton form a stable atom, why?

No rockets can fly to the moon due to the deceleration of earth gravity?

Do you want to win Nobel Prize for physics?

## Friday, November 24, 2017

1 electron carries 1 negative charge

if we smash the electron into 1000000 equal pieces, each piece will carry 1/1000000 negative charge. Let's call it enertron.

since enertrons carry the same negative charge, they repel each other.

if we have a perfect bottle, which means no leakage, no react, like glass bottle to air.

we put 1000000 enertrons into the perfect bottle, since enertrons repel each other, they put a pressure on the bottle wall. let's measure and call that pressure 1 volt.

if we put 8000000 enertrons into the same bottle, the pressure on the wall should be 4 volts.

now if 1 enertron is moving or vibrating, the rest all enertrons will be energized.

that is the mechanism of light/quantum.

now if we put 1 positive charge into the perfect bottle, what will happen?

enertrons should be attracted by the positive charge and form a ball around it, the closer to the positive charge the denser enertron cloud. the density of the enertron is decay at 1/rrr due to the repulsion force between enertrons decay at 1/rr.

now image enertron is the real thing, it carries a tiny negative charge, something like 1/10^33 electron charge, but it has a stronger force field, similar to neodymium magnet compare with iron magnet.

image proton actually carries 918 positive charges, it attracted 917 total charges of enertrons formed a solid ball, 1 electron attached to the ball to form a neutrally charged hydrogen atom. 1 atomic weight equals to 1936 total charges, no matter positive or negative charges.

this is the realistic atomic structure. the electrons are constantly vibrating on the plane at 90 degrees to the atom radius due to the kinetic energy it carries.

atoms are solid balls, matter is not compressible.

if atoms are constructed as science told you, 99.99% empty space, why matter is not compressible? electron shell/wave/cloud/orbital are negatively charged, they do not stick to positive changed nuclear is a magic, how can they stand any force/impact/reaction without crashing?

why is energy conserved?

if you put a moving force on any electrons with a force, that force is spreading to all the lines of sight electrons instantly by the repulsion force between them f=Kexee/rr, they all are moving now, and cannot stop ever.

do we have a perfect bottle?

yes, every atom is a perfect bottle. all matters are a perfect bottle. energy has nowhere to go but bounce within and between matters.

the forces f=Ke x e1e2/rr and f=G x m1m2/rr are like perfect springs between/within matters, connected all matters in 1.

## Tuesday, November 21, 2017

if you believe atoms are as science told you, 1 electron and 1 proton able to form a hydrogen atom, you are a fool.

you know opposite charges attract each other, but you don't ask why ? how? the cause and precise mechanism of the atomic structure.

you follow others, worship big names, listen to teachers, read books. smart enough to not question. you are a sheeple.

another example, common science lie. escape velocity.

science told you that if a rock is moving at 7 m/c=25,000 m/h away from earth, it will never return, it will fly away forever.

you believe it is true, never had a doubt. right?

let me ask you, is the rock always attracted by earth gravity at all the times?

is the rock decelerating all the time under gravity?

is the rock slowing down by time?

will the rock slow down to zero speed some day?

after that day, which way the rock moves?

will the rock soon or later come back to earth?

is science lied?

are you honest?

## Monday, November 20, 2017

truth can be simple as truth

all atomic structure theories, standard or bohr model, are total bs.

the attraction force between opposite charges is the strongest force in the universe, there is no possibility that electrons able to circle/wave/cloud around the protons, to form stable atom.

all science based on that model is false.

we can hardly separate two strong magnets, how nature makes electrons not stick to protons all the times?

the mechanism of light.

atoms are not as science told 99.99% empty space. atoms are solid spheres, electrons are not orbiting/waving/clouding but stable on the surface of atom ball.

image a positive charge is a ball shape single north pole, a negative charge is a ball shape single south pole.

a big/strong north pole will be surrounded by many tiny neodymium south poles, form an atom ball, iron south poles float on that atom ball as electrons.

maybe that's the true structure of the atom. assume that is true, follow the f=Ke x q1q2/rr fact, to see the world and everything.

put a strong magnet in each hand, the same pole faces each other, feel the tension? Now wave 1 hand at 90 degrees to the tension, what do you feel the other hand? I feel an opposite waving force.

if you move 1 hand in a clockwise circle, the other hand will move in a clockwise circle at 180 degrees polarity shift.

replace the magnet with the electron, see the mechanism of em phenomena, such as induction, light, em wave and energy.

electrons can only vibrate on the plane parallel to atom ball surface, the changing electrical force transfer to other lines of sight electrons instantly through the force lines of f=Ke x e1e2/rr. that is so-called emf. the force act as a class 1 lever with the pivot at the center, the mechanical advantage is equal to 1.

## Sunday, November 19, 2017

All light double slit experiments were done in the air, light travels in air/medium as wave form. If you do a new double slit experiment in a vacuum chamber, you can proof the old theory is wrong. You will find two light lines on the screen instead of interferentce.

set up like this

the light source/laser can be in the air, a square glass bottle, on the 2 parallel inside walls are the slits and the screen. connect the bottle to a vacuum pump.

show the light wave interference on the screen first, then pump the air out.

as the air pressure gets lower and lower, the light pattern on the screen should be changing.

until a hard vacuum, it should be only 2 bright lines left on the screen right behind the slits.

Please give it a shot, you may help improve science and win us some \$.

a good way to prove quantum mechanic is total bs

start science revolution

i already told you why maxwell em theory is bs

there is no transverse wave carrier in vacuum space.

the double slit is the most famous experiment so far.

quantum physics is based on its false result in the air, wave-particle duality is an illusion. light is vibrating electric force carrier by vibrating electrons. f=Ke x e1e2/rr is the carrier of light energy. that's why energy density decay at 1/rr.

golden opportunity in human history, hope you be the 1.

## Thursday, November 16, 2017

1. Einstein's theories are all mistakes.

Photoelectric effect theory won him a Nobel. Later he admit it was mistaken. All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me no nearer to the answer to the question, 'What are light quanta?' Nowadays every Tom, D i c k and Harry thinks he knows it, but he is mistaken. -Albert Einstein 1953

He thought gravity able to slow down light. If a star has enough mass, its light will be slow down so much and make it invisible, so black hole.

In reality, all star lights have the same speed C. Real black hole is in every toilet.

He thought the sun's gravity able to bend light so at solar eclipse we can see stars behind the sun.

In fact, hot plasma on sun's surface reflect/bend those stars light behind the sun. So those dumb scientists able to took a picture back then to support his theory.

He thought nothing can travel at light speed due to unlimited energy is needed.

Mistaken, he don't even sure what is energy/quantum.

All the motion is caused by force, electrostatic force. f=ma, enough force able to push matter at any speed.

But force has a speed limit, electrostatic force and gravity have same speed as light speed. A train travels at 100 m/h cannot push a man to 101/m/h.

E=Mcc is mistaken. Matter is matter, formed by charged particles. Energy is force that able to accelerate/move matter. How could the 2 equal?

2. Solar sail and EM drive both will not work.

Sun light has NO momentum. Solar sailing is a lie/mistake. Easy to proof, if sun light has momentum, how about Army laser? Those laser able to ignite missiles miles away, but not able to spin a light mill in hard vacuum. Why? Light is vibrating EM force, not photon/quanta particles that carry momentum.

EM drive is impossible. Without mass ejection in space, there is NO momentum changing, no force to accelerate.

3. Maxwell was wrong.

There is no electric field and magnetic field reproducing at right angle and move at light speed, no transverse waves travel in space.

Why? Because both fields must have force carrier/charged particle to carry it. But space contains none.

Free electrons in a conductor synchronized vibrate, produce vibrating EM field. Other free electrons in other conductors follow the vibrating energy/EM force and vibrate at the same frequency. That is the true mechanism of EM waves.

## Thursday, November 9, 2017

all line of sight electrons repel each other with a force f=Ke x e1e2/rr.

that force is the carrier of light/em wave/radiant energy/photon/quanta.

that same force is the cause of all electromagnetism. that force can make current flow, can magnetize iron, can induce current between conductors.

understood this, know energy is within matter.

## Friday, October 27, 2017

between 2 electrons at distance r, there exist a repulsion force f=Ke x ee/rr. that force is acting as a class 1 lever with the fulcrum at the center, the mechanical advantage is equal to 1.

if 1 electron is accelerating at 90 degrees to the force line, the other electron will instantly receive an opposite direction emf. this is the mechanism of electromagnetic radiation, light, em waves, how energy transfer through space.

true or false? i think it is true, explained many em phenomena.

------>sn    ns<-------  fixed position steel rods with magnets, the same pole faces each other, try the opposite direction emf. i use my hands as steel rods. i feel the emf, the energy, the quanta, the wave, the photon, the aether.

free energy my ass, i have to move my hand to induce energy on the other hand.

## Wednesday, October 25, 2017

ou is impossible if energy and momentum conservation are universal.

all things have a precise mechanism. science cannot explain the mechanism of magnetic force yet. why is moving current producing circling magnetic field? why is moving magnet producing a circling current? what exactly is a magnetic field? how it interacts with matter and charges?

about faradays paradox, spin magnet no radius direction current (any circling current on the disk? i find no videos yet, don't have the tools to test it), but if you move the magnet up and down, changing the distance to the copper disk, you should find clockwise and counterclockwise ac current on the disk, not radius direction current. you can measure a voltage between any two points on the outer ring of the disk. my prediction anyways. based on my belief of magnet carries circling electric force produced by atoms arranged into positive next to negative patterns. normal matters are formed by neutral atoms next to neutral atoms.

force is invisible, but we can feel/measure it. forces are always there as long as matters/charges exist.

look the universe from an atom. electrons are float on the surface of atom ball.

image a positive charge is a ball shape single north pole, a negative charge is a ball shape single south pole.

a big/strong north pole will be surrounded by many tiny neodymium south poles, form an atom ball, iron south poles float on that atom ball as electrons.

maybe that's the true structure of the atom. assume that is true, follow the f=Ke x q1q2/rr fact, to see the world and everything.

put a strong magnet in each hand, the same pole faces each other, feel the tension? Now wave 1 hand at 90 degrees to the tension, what do you feel the other hand? I feel an opposite waving force.

if you move 1 hand in a clockwise circle, the other hand will move in a clockwise circle at 180 degrees polarity shift.

replace the magnet with the electron, see the mechanism of em phenomena, such as induction, light, em wave and energy.

electrons can only vibrate on the plane parallel to atom ball surface, the changing electrical force transfer to other lines of sight electrons instantly through the force lines of f=Ke x e1e2/rr. that is so-called emf. the force act as a class 1 lever with the pivot at the center, the mechanical advantage is equal to 1.

get two magnets, try to feel the repulsion force, action and reaction of both hands. hope you will understand the mechanism of radiation, heat transfer, light, em waves, energy and quanta.

hope einstein has internet.

## Wednesday, October 18, 2017

scientists are mostly blinder. they learned from bad teachers. space-time is BS. einstein all theories are BS. the force between charges f=Ke x pq/rr is the carrier of all radiation/em wave/light/quanta. that force is like a massless physical rod connected charges all the time. that force is also like a zero resistance conductor connected charges in space. that's why light speed in space is infinite. science is after fact and mechanism, not after big names and theories.﻿

## Monday, October 16, 2017

light is ac current, vibrating electric force.

every atom is an ac generator. electrons vibrate on the plane perpendicular to the radius due to their momentum.

assume your room is a vacuum chamber, if the distance between the screen and your eyes is r, the repulsion force between the electrons on the screen and your eyes is f=Ke x ee/rr. that force is the carrier of light.

if the electrons on the screen vibrate at a frequency, electrons on your eyes will get f strength of ac current at the same frequency.

there is no time delay in the vacuum space, a force has zero mass, from f=ma, any forces have infinite acceleration, all forces are instantaneous in the vacuum space.

forces pass through matters/mediums have limited speed, due to f=ma, all matters have mass.

## Sunday, September 24, 2017

MAGNETISM

2 parallel wires at r distance, the free electrons in the 2 wires repel each other with force f=Ke x q1q2/rr, that force is the carrier of energy/moving electric force/emf. that force act as a class 1 lever with the fulcrum at the center, the mechanical advantage is equal to 1.

if electrons move in wire 1, electrons in wire 2 will instantly have opposite direction emf. the true mechanism of electromagnetic induction. same as momentum conservation.

every magnetic atom/magton contains 2 atoms. 2 atoms of a ferromagnetic matter before magnetize, we put it as 00. if 1 electron moved from 1 atom to the other atom and stays there as -11, the 2 atoms become a magton, it carries a special property now, we call it magnetic force.

-11, -22, -33...-nn are all magton, but carry different magnetic force strength.

2 magtons attract each other in the direction -11><-11, and repel each other in the direction -11<>1-1 or 1-1<>-11.

use copper wire winding around an iron core, put a current, the electrons in the wire move in circles around the core, make atoms in the core arrange into -11-11 directions all the way. on the pole plane area, magtons are arranged as clockwise concentric circles of -11-11 directions, north pole.

reverse the current direction, the pole plane area magtons are arranged as counterclockwise concentric circles of -11-11 directions, south pole.

so, a magnet north pole stored clockwise electric force, south pole stored the counterclockwise electric force. the same poles always repel, different poles always attract.

the earth magnetic field is a mistake. there is no field but the force in the universe. sunlight moves electrons moving westward causing earth magnetic force interact with compasses.

there is only 1 force exists, coulomb force f=Ke x q1q2/rr. gravity and magnetic force are both different configurations of electric force.

without matters, there is no force. a single matter has no force. force can only exist between matters.

without a test body, where is the electric or magnetic field? where is gravity field?

the mysteries of the universe are within 2 equations.

f=Ke x e1e1/rr and f=G x m1m2/rr.

those 2 forces rule everything existing.

the mechanism of quantum entanglement is simple. the force between any 2 charged particles f=Ke x qp/rr is the carrier of energy/information/moving electric force. it is an invisible physical rod with zero mass that always connected 2 particles as 1. if 1 particle is energized, that energy instantly transferred to another. from f=ma, m=0, so energy instantly moved from 1 particle to another. we call it QE.

Coil Less Ggenerator principle

drop a magnet in a copper tube, it produces current circling the tube, if we cut a gap along the tube, there should be a voltage between the gap.

can we use copper tubing replace the coils to make a generator? it should be less resistance, smaller and lighter.

i wish i can draw or have the euips to try. think this way.

put a magnet on the bike tire, ns pole direction is circling direction, it will generate a current on the fender at 90 degrees, the two edges are the terminals.

Magnetic Propulsion System principle

if we move charged mercury in a ring at high speed, it will produce strong circling electric force/magnetic force/magnetic field. can we use that force interacting with earth magnetic force to produce thrust?

replace the mercury ring by a strong ring magnet, should be the same thing? powered by gas engines?

seen night vision ufo orbs? when they powered up, the orbs increase volume.

seen magnet drop in copper tube producing light?

maybe store the momentum in a flywheel, engage to idle sping magnet whenever need?

maybe use the moving mercury ring as the flywheel, connect it to same mass mercury in an insulated container. make the two bodies of mercury as capacitor terminals.

increase the voltage between the mercury in the ring and the stored mercury, increase the magnetic force. simpler design?

## Sunday, September 17, 2017

https://phys.org/news/2017-09-supernova-analysis-reframes-dark-energy.html

as usual, they deleted my comment, banned my ip. as all science forums.

please enjoy the original comments, expose their lies., at the next few blogs.

Thank God. I saved enough evidence to expose FUCKED SCIENCE!

##### dnatwork
2 / 5 (5)6 hours ago
I commented a couple weeks ago with the idea that dark energy (and dark matter) need not exist if the theory took the frame of reference as a real thing to be accounted for, not just an analogy to explain things near the speed of light. This article is basically what I meant; they are talking about the clocks, but of course, the speed of your clock depends on your frame of reference.

I was also thinking gravity is not a real force, but an emergent effect, just inertia in another form. We'll see.
##### Parsec
3 / 5 (2)6 hours ago
The principle of Occam's Razor favors the model without cosmological acceleration.
##### Hyperfuzzy
2 / 5 (4)5 hours ago
First, you are looking at it all wrong. Space is infinite in time and physical dimension. Charge is infinite from it's center to infinity. The motion of a charge's center produces a wave in its field, no other field affected only another's center may be affected, effected, whatever ... This describes space as it is, not how you are calculating. Light, or a wrinkle in its field ... all that exists. There is no "thing" called mass but a "mass" of these centers!

Get it? These fields are everywhere, there does not exist "Nothing!". So yes, your dark mattter is created by assuming "Nothing" really exist. LOL! So from a distance, how may any wavelet be perceived? Forward, backward? Also from within an atom and within greater and greater numbers ... does attraction always win? Note: These centers only obey the law; there is no law defining any configuration other than the applied field or lack thereof. So each center may occupy the same point in space and time.
##### Hyperfuzzy
2 / 5 (4)5 hours ago
Hope you guys are not using QM and GR. You know that's nonsense, mostly. Good try, start with potential and kinectics into a wave equation, compute theorectical possibilities, evaluate reality with this?

Speed of light? Come on! Emitted_wavelength/Measured_Period, what is that? Velocity(+/-)?
##### oxivape
1 / 5 (1)4 hours ago
the mechanism of electromagnetism is simple, the force f=Ke x e1e2/rr between matters is the carrier of electromagnetism.

there is no field but force between two parallel copper wires at distance r. the repulsion force between electrons on the surface of the two wires. f=Ke x e1e2/rr.

if electrons move/accelerate in one wire, that repulsion force between electrons on the two wires will move/accelerate electrons in the other wire. the mechanism of electromagnetism.

there is no field, only electrostatic force at work.
##### oxivape
not rated yet3 hours ago
Op at glp, thanks again. got banned, can discuss science with you. sad.
##### oxivape
not rated yet3 hours ago
some metals such as iron can be easily magnetized by a coil. because the moving electrostatic force in the coil will spin electrons in the iron atom and make nuclear polarize/off center.

in a transformer, the electrons on the first coil and second coil always move/accelerate in the same direction at the same rate. the electrons move/vibrate in the first coil, the force between the electrons on the wire and the core f=Ke x e1e2/rr accelerate electrons in the core, the energy passes through the core and energize the electrons in the second coil.

the mechanism of electromagnetic induction. from fucked science dot com.
##### oxivape
not rated yet3 hours ago
without matters, there is no force. a single matter has no force. force can only exist between matters.

without a test body, where is the electric or magnetic field? where is gravity field?

the mysteries of the universe are within 2 equations.

f=Ke x e1e1/rr and f=G x m1m2/rr.

Those 2 forces rule everything existing. godlikeproductions.com/forum1/message3622806/pg20
##### oxivape
not rated yet3 hours ago
i predict that i will be banned soon. even i am using a new ip. space travel is a hoax. how iss radiate heat into space? where the heat go? finished?

no scientists know what is energy. not einstain. he said he knows shit about what is light quanta. now every dick knows better. there is nO photon.
##### oxivape
not rated yet3 hours ago
photon travels at light speed, carry electric field and magnetic field at 90 degrees, pass the space between sun and earth to reach us?

total BS. gravity slows down light? why flash light and sun light same speed? how gravity bend space and time? space and time have no mass. how gravity interacts with nothing? fk qm and gr or sr. clean your toilet, find you a while hole.
##### oxivape
not rated yet3 hours ago
energy is accelerating electrostatic force carried by accelerating matter/charge.
##### oxivape
not rated yet3 hours ago
gravity is induced electrostatic force between neutrally charged matters. the force between 2 charged particles f=Ke x pq/rr is the mechanism of quantum entanglement. it work as a perfect rod connected 2 particles in 1. the rod is mass less, from f=ma, the energy/moving force is instantly transferred.
##### Whydening Gyre
not rated yet3 hours ago
FTA;
"Dark energy is usually assumed to form roughly 70% of the present material content of the Universe."
So, since when did dark energy become "material"?!?
##### oxivape
5 / 5 (1)3 hours ago
why 1 star me?
##### Benni
4 / 5 (1)3 hours ago
Schneibo is now oxivape.

why 1 star me?
Schneibo, for the same reason I always 1 star you.
##### oxivape
not rated yet3 hours ago

none scientist, or any science paper, has a clear, rational, precise definition of energy.

what is energy?

energy is moving electrostatic force carried by moving matter.

magnetic force and gravity are both electrostatic force in a different configuration.

gravity is induced attraction force between neutrally charged masses.

magnetic force is caused by off center/polarized nuclear/enertron ball of atoms.

that is why magnetic force decays at 1/rrr.

ring a bell?
##### oxivape
not rated yet3 hours ago
Hope you guys are not using QM and GR. You know that's nonsense, mostly. Good try, start with potential and kinectics into a wave equation, compute theorectical possibilities, evaluate reality with this?

Speed of light? Come on! Emitted_wavelength/Measured_Period, what is that? Velocity(+/-)?

##### Da Schneib
1 / 5 (1)2 hours ago

I note that it is still open for comment. I note that you did not respond to my posts. It was an interesting conversation but in the absence of any response from you I think I showed that gravity is a "real thing," not an analogy. We can continue here or there, your pleasure.

Meanwhile, I don't understand why you think the timescape model of Smale et al. is anything like saying gravity is not real, and is an analogy. Can you explain that in a bit more detail for us please?
##### oxivape
not rated yet2 hours ago
Is no one around?
##### Benni
4 / 5 (1)2 hours ago
Is no one around?

You should be conversing with the guy right above you, schneibo, he's one of those s'plainers.
##### oxivape
not rated yet2 hours ago
light does not propagate in vacuum space, there is no light in vacuum space.

light is electrons vibration force, only exist within matters, only propagate within matters/mediums.

a black hole is impossible

all matters carry light

bigger mass, stronger light.

electrons can only move/vibrate along the plane perpendicular to the radius of the atoms on the surface of matters.

the electrical force/field is oscillating on the plane and the energy is propagating at 90 degrees.

this is all happening within matter/medium.

in the vacuum, the force between electrons on the sun surface and our outer atmosphere surface atoms instantly transfer the energy. pass it through the atmosphere to us.

the transverse wave only exists within matter.

man made em waves are a different story

the electrons vibrate a longer distance in the antenna, at much lower rate.
##### oxivape
not rated yet2 hours ago
i got banned from all science forums long ago. only can talk science at glp. now they banned me again, even i use new ip. this is the new place/only one i can learn science.

before i get benned , please talk with me!
##### Da Schneib
2.5 / 5 (2)2 hours ago
The principle of Occam's Razor favors the model without cosmological acceleration.
But it doesn't explain the supernova data, which means a model without cosmological acceleration doesn't fit reality. Occam's Razor doesn't work if the models it's being used on don't fit reality well. In other words, if you shave too close. ;)
##### Benni
3 / 5 (1)1 hour ago
Can you explain that in a bit more detail for us please?

Well Schneibo, why don't you try more of that Funny Farm Physics stuff & be more clear as to why gravity is DENSITY DEPENDENT & not MASS DEPENDENT.

Explain the Law of Physics that demonstrates how a given mass can change it's gravity field to the point that a given mass stellar body can be made so small that it's gravity field at the surface reaches infinity,
##### oxivape
not rated yet1 hour ago

do you really know what is energy? not even einstein.

what is ENERGY?

coal? fuel? oxygen? wind? sunlight? any matters?

NO. matter is not energy. matter is the carrier/source/container of energy.

a rock at rest only has its thermal energy.

if you threw it away, your hand put a force on the rock pushing it moving at a speed v, the moving rock will have 1/2mvv energy added on it. we call it kinetic energy.

if the flying rock hits a wall, that energy becomes the impact force that hits the wall, makes atoms on the wall vibrate faster/hotter, atoms thermal energy.

so, energy is nothing but vibrating force/moving force.

energy is always vibrating/moving, within and between matters. matter is always moving/vibrating due to the existence of energy.

nothing is ever at rest, keep moving, changing, involving, reforming, transforming.

somehow, LIFE woke up?
##### oxivape
not rated yet1 hour ago
haha lost in the stars, click all!
##### Benni
5 / 5 (1)1 hour ago
i got banned from all science forums long ago. only can talk science at glp. now they banned me again, even i use new ip. this is the new place/only one i can learn science.

before i get benned , please talk with me!

oxi......please don't despair, Schneibo is now on site & will converse with you. At he moment he's a little busy on some other Funny Farm explanations of science, but I guarantee he'll be along he will be here for you & to be your friend, you seem just like his type of guy.
##### oxivape
not rated yet1 hour ago
Thank you, Sir!
##### Da Schneib
not rated yet1 hour ago
Here is the arXiv open access copy of this paper: https://phys.org/...rgy.html

There is a very active debate going on right now about dark energy, regarding whether the presumption of the overall FLRW evenness applies in a non-homogeneous universe like ours, with voids and filaments. This paper provides some evidence using lately collected data. It will be interesting to see how this falls out when all is said and done.
##### oxivape
not rated yet1 hour ago
nasa faked moon landing, some shadows are right under the object, means they made the video at noon time, which is not morning time as they said/should.

nasa, china, japan all fake news about solar sails work in space, photons able to transfer momentum to solar sail to accelerate spaceship.

they lied right in front your eyes.

if light/photon has momentum, why is laser beam cannot bend a flame? why is light mill not moving in a hard vacuum?

all space missions are fake, cuz they faked the time delay for space radio transmission.

light/em waves travel in vacuum space at an infinite speed, only within mediums at a limited speed.

so any communication takes more than 1/100 second is faked.

all scientists think light speed is c in the vacuum, they all wrong.

if light speed is limited in vacuum space, all stars, galaxies we see are from the past, how we map the universe and measure the total mass?

it is all bs, all lies.
##### oxivape
not rated yet1 hour ago

there is no solar wind. what mechanism? why protons and electrons on the way to earth do not attract each other and form into hydrogen atoms? why does gravity not pull them back into the sun?

van allan belts? what's mechanism? the sun's energy/radiation/light strength decay at 1/rr, the only way to find stronger radiation is to get closer.

near around earth, radiation strength is the same, within the atmosphere, it decreases.

so between earth and the moon, the radiation strength is about the same, less within our atmosphere.

em drive? powered by quantum vacuum virtual plasma. it is voodoo science.

ligo detected gravity wave? you wave hand will produce more detectable gravity wave than far away stars explode. why ligo cannot detect cme or earthquakes?

gravity wave speed is infinite, gravity has to be instantaneous, otherwise, no planets can stay in orbit.
##### oxivape
not rated yet1 hour ago
the sun is not an active reactor.

if energy can never leak/vanish into space, why all the fuels we used did not make earth warmer?

if you cut a channel between the ocean and a lake, the water level will be the same. if rained 1 foot into the lake, the water level will be still the same.

if rained 1 inch in the ocean, the lake will be flooded by 1 inch.

the sun's energy/vibrating electrostatic force/radiation stays within the upper atmosphere and moves around the earth. That energy/electrical current stays within the atmosphere and crust and moves westward at 1000 miles per hour at the equator, produces earth magnetic field, causes polar lights.

transforms into matters movement, the wind, clouds, waves, photosynthesis and more.
##### oxivape
not rated yet44 minutes ago
i dropped out college, majored in physics. poor english, bad math. how did i learn all my concepts?

maybe a silence voice guiding me. basically, i don't accept a scientific theory without understanding its mechanism. how 1 electron and 1 proton able to form a stable atom? according to laws, they got to collide under the force.

from there, been a long way. to know what is light quanta. thank you all, thank God.
##### oxivape
not rated yet37 minutes ago
1 electron carries 1 negative charge

if we smash the electron into 1000000 equal pieces, each piece will carry 1/1000000 negative charge. Let's call it enertron.

since enertrons carry the same negative charge, they repel each other.

if we have a perfect bottle, which means no leakage, no react, like glass bottle to air.

we put 1000000 enertrons into the perfect bottle, since enertrons repel each other, they put a pressure on the bottle wall. let's measure and call that pressure 1 volt.

if we put 8000000 enertrons into the same bottle, the pressure on the wall should be 4 volts.

now if 1 enertron is moving or vibrating, the rest all enertrons will be energized.

that is the mechanism of light/quantum.

now if we put 1 positive charge into the perfect bottle, what will happen?
##### oxivape
not rated yet33 minutes ago

enertrons should be attracted by the positive charge and form a ball around it, the closer to the positive charge the denser enertron cloud. the density of the enertron is decay at 1/rrr due to the repulsion force between enertrons decay at 1/rr.

the enertron cloud is always vibrating, due to the existence of energy, the unbalance attraction force and repulsion force, within the enertron cloud and the center positive charge.

now image enertron is the real thing, it carries a tiny negative charge, something like 1/10^33 electron charge, but it has a stronger force field, similar to neodymium magnet compare with iron magnet.

image proton actually carries 918 positive charges, it attracted 917 total charges of enertrons formed a solid ball, 1 electron attached to the ball to form a neutrally charged hydrogen atom. 1 atomic weight equals to 1936 total charges, no matter positive or negative charges.

this is the realistic atomic structure.
##### oxivape
not rated yet29 minutes ago
atoms are solid balls, matter is not compressible. such as water.

if atoms are constructed as science told you, why matter is not compressible? electron shell/wave/cloud/orbital are negatively charged, they do not stick to positive changed nuclear is a magic, how can they stand any force/impact/reaction without crashing?

why is energy conserved?

if you push/put a moving force on any enertron with a force f, that force is spreading to all the enertrons in the bottle at light speed, they all are moving now, and cannot stop ever.

do we have a perfect bottle?

yes, every atom is a perfect bottle. all matters are a perfect bottle. energy has nowhere to go but bounce within and between matters.

the forces f=Ke x e1e2/rr and f=G x m1m2/rr are like perfect springs between/within matters, connected all matters in 1.
##### oxivape
not rated yet24 minutes ago
All things have a very precise mechanism.

The sun is not shooting out light/em wave/photon/energy to every direction, it only shares its vibration em force with matters surround. the energy/force strength is proportional to sun's temperature and mass, inversely proportional to distance squared.

The sun's energy is from star formation, not from on going nuclear reaction.

The sun will never cool off a bit without other huge mass come closer.

To understand all this, must understand atom structure first.

for those believe our sun is a nuclear reactor, ask yourself few questions.

why does all the nuclear fuel not ignite at once?

how the energy reaches earth?

if the sun has radiated out energy for 5 billion years, where is all that energy?

what is energy? moving force produced by moving mass?
##### oxivape
not rated yet19 minutes ago
matter is made from charged particles.

opposite charged particles attract each other, they collide like magnet and iron ball. the impact force/energy becomes heat/thermal energy of the atoms.

the more atoms get together by gravity attraction, the more mass is added, the higher thermal energy density, the higher temperature.

so bigger star carries more energy, produces stronger light.

the energy is stored in vibrating atoms/charged particles.

the energy a star carry is the vibrating gravity and electrostatic force in its total mass/charges.

the sun's energy is from star formation, the sun is not an active nuclear reactor.

the energy cannot vanish into space but share with other matters surround according to their distance.

the sun's energy circling around earth as earth spins.
##### oxivape
not rated yet15 minutes ago
connect the dots, see the elephant?

is my elephant prettier than yours?

next time run out toilet paper, use phd paper!
##### kjung6921
Aren't there any moderators on this site? Too bad. It's a great site with great articles and the comment section (at least at the end of this article where I hoped to find some intelligent discussion of this latest news on the dark energy front) is literally the drooling ward in One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest.

Very sad. Very sad indeed. Does anyone know where physics students meet to discuss these things, where moderators kick out the dingbats?

Just curious.

3 hours ago
connect the dots, see the elephant?

is my elephant prettier than yours?

next time run out toilet paper, use phd paper!
##### kjung6921
5 / 5 (2)3 hours ago
Aren't there any moderators on this site? Too bad. It's a great site with great articles and the comment section (at least at the end of this article where I hoped to find some intelligent discussion of this latest news on the dark energy front) is literally the drooling ward in One Flew Over the Cuckoo's Nest.

Very sad. Very sad indeed. Does anyone know where physics students meet to discuss these things, where moderators kick out the dingbats?

Just curious.
##### oxivape
not rated yet2 hours ago
maybe they agreed with my comment.

i want to learn better theory.
##### oxivape
not rated yet2 hours ago
i really thought you will love my joke. phd is very hard to get. not in my lifetime for me.

my iq is 4 digits, 96.33
##### oxivape
not rated yet2 hours ago
First, you are looking at it all wrong. Space is infinite in time and physical dimension. Charge is infinite from it's center to infinity. The motion of a charge's center produces a wave in its field, no other field affected only another's center may be affected, effected, whatever ... This describes space as it is, not how you are calculating. Light, or a wrinkle in its field ... all that exists. There is no "thing" called mass but a "mass" of these centers!

Get it? These fields are everywhere, there does not exist "Nothing!". So yes, your dark mattter is created by assuming "Nothing" really exist. LOL! So from a distance, how may any wavelet be perceived? Forward, backward? Also from within an atom and within greater and greater numbers ... does attraction always win? Note: These centers only obey the law; there is no law defining any configuration other than the applied field or lack thereof. So each center may occupy the same point in space and time. [/q

*
##### Eikka
not rated yet2 hours ago
maybe they agreed with my comment.

i want to learn better theory.

A famous university professor went to a monastery to hear about zen. The abbot of the monastery agreed to meet him for tea. Once the professor was seated, the master poured tea into a cup, slowly filling it to the brim until tea was spilling to the table and onto the floor.

"Enough, the cup is full!", said the professor.

"You are like this cup, so full of opinions and ideas. How can I tell you of zen if you don't first empty your cup? Come back when your cup is empty.", said the teacher.
##### oxivape
not rated yet2 hours ago
i see no tea, is my cup leaking?
##### oxivape
not rated yet2 hours ago
if you can't laugh at a good joke, how can you ever get laid?
##### oxivape
not rated yet2 hours ago
opposite charges attract each other, same as man and woman.

married couples still attract other man and woman.

just like neutrally charged atoms attract other atoms.

gravity is induced electrostatic attraction force between neutrally charged matters.

sex outside of marriage is induced sexual attraction between married couples.

this can be proved by f=K x q1q2/rr and F= G x m1m2/rr.

scientists were blind. look all the mistakes they made.
##### oxivape
not rated yet2 hours ago
light is light, from you or from me. we are 1.

##### oxivape
not rated yet1 hour ago
i got banned from all science forums long ago. only can talk science at glp. now they banned me again, even i use new ip. this is the new place/only one i can learn science.

before i get benned , please talk with me!

oxi......please don't despair, Schneibo is now on site & will converse with you. At he moment he's a little busy on some other Funny Farm explanations of science, but I guarantee he'll be along he will be here for you & to be your friend, you seem just like his type of guy.
##### wduckss
not rated yet1 hour ago
@oxivape
Still, part "force is proportional to sun's temperature and mass, inversely proportional to distance squared". Not true, the temperature on the dark side of Mars is more than the Moon and the Mercury.
##### oxivape
not rated yet1 hour ago
test
##### oxivape
not rated yet1 hour ago
the foundation of science is based on the atomic structure. without fully understanding it, how can we understand the rest of everything/matter and energy?

a conductor has free electrons, apply a voltage those electrons will move along the electrical force.

within the conductor atoms, the positive charged nuclear attracts electrons with super strong force/high voltage, how come there is no discharge? how can electrons not move to the nuclear?

a non-conductor has no free electrons. why? isn't atoms are electron clouds/orbitals/waves around a positive nuclear? why is no free electron? are those electrons locked within the atom? how? what's the mechanism? by what force? quantum magic?

isn't in fact, between 1 proton and 1 electron there is only 1 force exist? f=Ke x pq/rr?

SO, bohr and the standard model of atomic structure are both wrong. way off the reality.

why you accept it as fact or truth?

because professors, books, wiki, everyone educated say so?
##### oxivape
not rated yet1 hour ago
For more insight, look up valence electrons.

They make all the difference whether something is a conductor, semiconductor or insulator.

Metals have many loosely coupled electrons, making them excellent conductors.

Doped n or p type silicon and germanium have given us enough rope to hang ourselves with.

Let's not even argue electrons!

Within the matrix of a semiconductor junction, electrons cannot flow through the crystalline substrate until HOLES migrate backwards.

Like a 16 panel tile game, a "space" must migrate through the silicon to allow electron progress into the desired order.

Because that's where the beast invades this system.
##### oxivape
not rated yet1 hour ago
Slowly, step by step, 100 years of life at physics and the House of Cards is crumbling!

But is difficult to fight the 5 generations of indoctrinated scientists: Think like me or NO MORE SOUP FOR YOU (Seinfeld).

Oh they just like to measure. Don't have a clue as to where anything comes from or why/how. Just the equations. They worked hard to learn those equations, no human is gonna tell them they mean nothing!

We've wasted 100 years! If we had just listened to Heaviside and Steinmetz, instead of going full speed with Einstein, my gawd the discoveries we could have already achieved!

Thank god articles like this are finally coming out. It means someone is freaking thinking for a change!
##### oxivape
not rated yet57 minutes ago
@oxivape
Still, part "force is proportional to sun's temperature and mass, inversely proportional to distance squared". Not true, the temperature on the dark side of Mars is more than the Moon and the Mercury.

the more mass, higher inhabited temperature. how they measure those data? they don't even know if the moon has water. why don't you tell us what is energy?
##### ViperSRT3g
not rated yet54 minutes ago
I'm still wondering if this will eventually be explained with the universe was expanding faster in the past, and so because we're seeing things not as they are now, but as they were, they appear to be moving away from us at a much greater speed than objects closer to us in time and space.
##### oxivape
not rated yet47 minutes ago
how do you know expanding is true? they don't even know light does not propagate in space, there is no photon, energy instantly teleported between masses.

red shift? maybe gases in the space at work.
##### Hyperfuzzy
not rated yet37 minutes ago
Finally, measure the speed of light this way emitted_wavelength/measured_period. Now, the way I see it, we do not have enough information to determine the flow of our local universe, let alone the entire bucket of worms.

If you notice, attraction trumps repulsion, i.e. unlike charges will tend to be closer together than like charges; thus, the supperposition of each charge center will be like-wise! But, think you need a few more vector quantities. If you go with Einstein, bets are off you will ever enter space!
##### oxivape
not rated yet33 minutes ago
what is time?

if we put the same clock in the sun and the earth for 1 day

the earth clock will read/run 24 hours, the sun clock will read fewer hours.

which clock is correct? what time is correct time?

we use matters movement to measure time, what we measured is the changing of the movement, the reading on the timer.

all matters, all things are constantly moving, never stop.

time is always moving with all things right now.

past and future only exist in our minds.

a living tree can be a timer

a blooming flower can be a timer

but the tree and the flower are not time

nor the readings on the clock

all the time we/the universe/existence have is ever changing now
##### Hyperfuzzy
not rated yet31 minutes ago
So I would expect something bigger than I've ever seen that can control the flow of galaxies, juz say'n The expansion from us? We're all in a stream, acclerating? Well, first which galaxies are moving away and in what direction are they moving relative to us. Be esiear if you let a computer tell you what is really going on than these guys who say, "I don't know, Dark Matter?" LOL

if it is a stream it can be a supposition of 3 points, us centered; therefore, verifiable data, ...
##### Hyperfuzzy
not rated yet28 minutes ago
Anyway, the stream shall define an unseen object! Not something that we do not know exist and what it is, a real object!

So, looking at the distances, we got time! But don't know about life on earth.
##### Hyperfuzzy
not rated yet20 minutes ago
Your eyes, you see a light, did the plane wave move over you front to back or back to front. In other words, can you update each wavelet as a time sequence, forward or backward. I'm afraid, you will be required to know exactly what you are observing and can absolutely define the time line. Just when you thought this was getting to be really fun, isolated objects in space, of stable sizes, may have which rotators? Either!!! Anti-Matter?
##### Hyperfuzzy
not rated yet15 minutes ago
Being a member of a stream and an isolated object; what would be the observable differences? Remember, we are new to this world; I think we get only one shot at getting it correctly speaking, i.e. it better be right!
##### Hyperfuzzy
not rated yet9 minutes ago
We quote PhD's, that's because, some of these actually measure nature and collect knowledge; like Maxwell; others invent knowledge. I fly upon the wings of Maxwell and those who provided the data that properly defines knowledge!
##### oxivape
not rated yet4 minutes ago
maxwell was wrong, what carries transverse waves in the empty space?
##### oxivape
photon? aether? quanta? moving e and m fields? what's the field carriers? what's the mechanism of em waves??

Whops...that worked fast. Thanks mods!
##### ciggenie
1 / 5 (4)20 hours ago
told you i will be banned soon,

thank God, pasted some comments on fuckedscience.com.

righteous man are few, be one! take care.
##### ciggenie
1 / 5 (6)20 hours ago
nasa faked moon landing, some shadows are right under the object, means they made the video at noon time, which is not morning time as they said/should.

nasa, china, japan all fake news about solar sails work in space, photons able to transfer momentum to solar sail to accelerate spaceship.

they lied right in front your eyes.

if light/photon has momentum, why is laser beam cannot bend a flame? why is light mill not moving in a hard vacuum?

all space missions are fake, cuz they faked the time delay for space radio transmission.

light/em waves travel in vacuum space at an infinite speed, only within mediums at a limited speed.

so any communication takes more than 1/100 second is faked.

all scientists think light speed is c in the vacuum, they all wrong.

if light speed is limited in vacuum space, all stars, galaxies we see are from the past, how we map the universe and measure the total mass?

it is all bs, all lies.
##### ciggenie
1 / 5 (6)20 hours ago

it is all bs, all lies.

there is no solar wind. what mechanism? why protons and electrons on the way to earth do not attract each other and form into hydrogen atoms? why does gravity not pull them back into the sun?

van allan belts? what's mechanism? the sun's energy/radiation/light strength decay at 1/rr, the only way to find stronger radiation is to get closer.

near around earth, radiation strength is the same, within the atmosphere, it decreases.

so between earth and the moon, the radiation strength is about the same, less within our atmosphere.

em drive? powered by quantum vacuum virtual plasma. it is voodoo science.

ligo detected gravity wave? you wave hand will produce more detectable gravity wave than far away stars explode.

why can't ligo detect cme or earthquakes?

gravity wave speed is infinite, gravity has to be instantaneous, otherwise, no planets can stay in orbit.
##### ciggenie
1 / 5 (5)20 hours ago
the foundation of science is based on the atomic structure. without fully understanding it, how can we understand the rest of everything/matter and energy?

a conductor has free electrons, apply a voltage those electrons will move along the electrical force.

within the conductor atoms, the positive charged nuclear attracts electrons with super strong force/high voltage, how come there is no discharge? how can electrons not move to the nuclear?

a non-conductor has no free electrons. why? isn't atoms are electron clouds/orbitals/waves around a positive nuclear? why is no free electron? are those electrons locked within the atom? how? what's the mechanism? by what force? quantum magic?

isn't in fact, between 1 proton and 1 electron there is only 1 force exist? f=Ke x pq/rr?

SO, bohr and the standard model of atomic structure are both wrong. way off the reality.

why you accept it as fact or truth?

because professors, books, wiki, everyone educated say so?
##### ciggenie
1 / 5 (5)20 hours ago
school and media are responsible for fooling people.

bs top scientists are leading the world's science.

those should go to the hospital.

Those are professors at Cambridge University. similar are teaching at MIT.

This is the world we live, wake the fuck up.

Their math is incorrect.

Positive numbers can never equal to negative numbers.

Do you think they don't know that equation is totally wrong? they knew it 100%.

Then why they put the video on youtube to fool the world?

What else are they teaching in school?

Those people own the education system, own science. don't let them own you.

##### ciggenie
1 / 5 (5)19 hours ago
what is time?

if we put the same clock in the sun and the earth for 1 day

the earth clock will read/run 24 hours, the sun clock will read fewer hours.

which clock is correct? what time is correct time?

we use matters movement to measure time, what we measured is the changing of the movement, the reading on the timer.

all matters, all things are constantly moving, never stop.

time is always moving with all things right now.

past and future only exist in our minds.

a living tree can be a timer

a blooming flower can be a timer

but the tree and the flower are not time

nor the readings on the clock

all the time we/the universe/existence have is ever changing now

only what you become matters
##### ciggenie
1 / 5 (5)19 hours ago
##### ciggenie
1 / 5 (5)19 hours ago
if i can afford, will do the double slit experiment first.

the light source/laser can be in the air, a square glass bottle, on the 2 parallel inside walls are the slits and the screen. connect the bottle to a vacuum pump.

show the light wave interference on the screen first, then pump the air out.

as the air pressure gets lower and lower, the light pattern on the screen should be changing.

until a hard vacuum, it should be only 2 bright lines left on the screen right behind the slits.

##### ciggenie
1 / 5 (5)19 hours ago
shameless scientists cannot explain how atoms are formed.

they invented orbital model/bohr, improved it to the standard model, made up quantum mechanics.

push uncertainty principle, wave-particle duality, black holes, tbb, relativity, time travel, simulation, space travel.

will, every dog has its day.

fake science is the next.
##### ciggenie
1 / 5 (5)19 hours ago
the foundation of science is based on the atomic structure. without fully understanding it, how can we understand the rest of everything/matter and energy?

a conductor has free electrons, apply a voltage those electrons will move along the electrical force.

within the conductor atoms, the positive charged nuclear attracts electrons with super strong force/high voltage, how come there is no discharge? how can electrons not move to the nuclear?

a non-conductor has no free electrons. why? isn't atoms are electron clouds/orbitals/waves around a positive nuclear? why is no free electron? are those electrons locked within the atom? how? what's the mechanism? by what force? quantum magic?

isn't in fact, between 1 proton and 1 electron there is only 1 force exist? f=Ke x pq/rr?

SO, bohr and the standard model of atomic structure are both wrong. way off the reality.

why you accept it as fact or truth?

because professors, books, wiki, everyone educated say so?
##### ciggenie
1 / 5 (5)19 hours ago
For more insight, look up valence electrons.

They make all the difference whether something is a conductor, semiconductor or insulator.

Metals have many loosely coupled electrons, making them excellent conductors.

Doped n or p type silicon and germanium have given us enough rope to hang ourselves with.

Let's not even argue electrons!

Within the matrix of a semiconductor junction, electrons cannot flow through the crystalline substrate until HOLES migrate backwards.

Like a 16 panel tile game, a "space" must migrate through the silicon to allow electron progress into the desired order.

Because that's where the beast invades this system.
##### ciggenie
1 / 5 (5)19 hours ago
Slowly, step by step, 100 years of life at physics and the House of Cards is crumbling!

But is difficult to fight the 5 generations of indoctrinated scientists: Think like me or NO MORE SOUP FOR YOU (Seinfeld).

Oh, they just like to measure. Don't have a clue as to where anything comes from or why/how. Just the equations. They worked hard to learn those equations, no human is gonna tell them they mean nothing!

We've wasted 100 years! If we had just listened to Heaviside and Steinmetz, instead of going full speed with Einstein, my Gawd the discoveries we could have already achieved!

Thank God articles like this are finally coming out. It means someone is freaking thinking for a change!
##### ciggenie
1 / 5 (5)18 hours ago
not rated yet47 minutes ago
how do you know expanding is true? they don't even know light does not propagate in space, there is no photon, energy instantly teleported between masses.

red shift? maybe gases in the space at work.
##### ciggenie
1 / 5 (4)18 hours ago
@oxivape
http://www.svemir...-correct
Still, part "force is proportional to sun's temperature and mass, inversely proportional to distance squared". Not true, the temperature on the dark side of Mars is more than the Moon and the Mercury.

the more mass, higher inhabited temperature. how they measure those data? they don't even know if the moon has water. why don't you tell us what is energy
##### Reg Mundy
18 hours ago
@dnatwork
I commented a couple weeks ago with the idea that dark energy (and dark matter) need not exist if the theory took the frame of reference as a real thing to be accounted for, not just an analogy to explain things near the speed of light. This article is basically what I meant; they are talking about the clocks, but of course, the speed of your clock depends on your frame of reference.

I was also thinking gravity is not a real force, but an emergent effect, just inertia in another form. We'll see.

Congratulations, you have seen the light.
##### ciggenie
1 / 5 (3)17 hours ago
what light? gravity is most accurately measured stuff in science. f=G x m1m2/rr.
##### Da Schneib
5 / 5 (4)17 hours ago
Persistent, isn't he, our Zeph,
##### antialias_physorg
5 / 5 (5)17 hours ago
Persistent, isn't he, our Zeph,

He likes to type for the circular file.
(and I guess he hasn't figured out that non one is reading his walls of text anyways.)

Oh, well...one more crazy kept off the street.
##### Reg Mundy
4 / 5 (4)17 hours ago
@moderators
Howz about stopping anybody from posting more than, say, three times on any thread? The idiots have ruined this interesting and perfectly good discussion

/ 5 (4)
16 hours ago
@moderators
Howz about stopping anybody from posting more than, say, three times on any thread? The idiots have ruined this interesting and perfectly good discussion...

Then Schneibo wouldn't be able to push his DENSITY DEPENDENT theories of gravity versus the demonstrable Fundamental laws of Physics that gravity is MASS DEPENDENT.

So be careful what you wish for, it may only result in a tradeoff of one kind of a fruitcake for another.
##### dnatwork
3 / 5 (2)15 hours ago

I note that it is still open for comment. I note that you did not respond to my posts. It was an interesting conversation but in the absence of any response from you I think I showed that gravity is a "real thing," not an analogy. We can continue here or there, your pleasure.

Meanwhile, I don't understand why you think the timescape model of Smale et al. is anything like saying gravity is not real, and is an analogy. Can you explain that in a bit more detail for us please?

I didn't say this article said anything about gravity being an effect rather than real, just that that was the other thing I said two weeks ago. I was not convinced by your statements, but I don't have the math to support my intuition, so I dropped it.
##### dnatwork
3 / 5 (2)14 hours ago
Anyway, if the light we observe had to pass through billions of years and quadrillion's of miles of space, it must have passed through many different reference frames, all of which are different from ours. Moreover, either the universe was expanding throughout that time, or the space around every bit of mass was collapsing in on itself, but either way everything was getting farther apart. These guys had the math and the knowledge to point out that therefore it is not valid to assume the Friedman law is correct, that space is flat or whatever. It would have to be tested and proven instead.

If that's true, then what other assumptions in the standard model are untested and unproven? Yes, your equations produce the correct results for the perihelion of Mercury. Does that mean there are no other equations that could do the same? Or that every assumption in the model is correct? No, and no.
##### dnatwork
3.7 / 5 (3)14 hours ago
So if I say "gravity might just be inertia in curved space, not any kind of force at all," and you say "the standard model explains all this so gravity is a real force, but our theory leads us to have no clue what 95% of the universe is" well, I'm not going to be convinced. And that was before these guys pointed out the weakness of the assumptions on flat space. It just didn't pass any sniff test.
##### dnatwork
3.7 / 5 (3)14 hours ago
I'm actually arguing for most of the standard model to be kept, I just think it's overbuilt. Take away a few things, but don't replace them with anything. No gravity, because inertia does all the work you need if you let it follow the curves of spacetime. No dark energy or dark matter, because changing reference frames do all the work you need if you let spacetime warp and stretch in different ways (but always according to the same laws applied in differing environments) throughout space and time. Derive those effects from first principles, don't assume they are laws.

I don't know what else might be pruned, but any model that forces you to weird conclusions needs to be cut back until it matches the facts.
##### ciggenie
not rated yet14 hours ago
i care, you are correct.
##### ciggenie
not rated yet14 hours ago
I commented a couple weeks ago with the idea that dark energy (and dark matter) need not exist if the theory took the frame of reference as a real thing to be accounted for, not just an analogy to explain things near the speed of light. This article is basically what I meant; they are talking about the clocks, but of course, the speed of your clock depends on your frame of reference.

I was also thinking gravity is not a real force, but an emergent effect, just inertia in another form. We'll see.

why no 1 gives you a fuck? all your friends? any real scientists? i see but you Sir!
##### fthompson495
1 / 5 (1)13 hours ago
We are in the outflow of a Universal black hole. As ordinary matter falls toward the Universal black hole it evaporates into dark matter. It is the dark matter outflow which pushes the galaxy clusters, causing them to move outward and away from us. The dark matter outflow is dark energy.
##### kjung6921
5 / 5 (3)13 hours ago
"The accelerating expansion of the Universe may not be real..."

The biggest NEVER MIND in the history of science (following the extreme upheavals to cosmology, astronomy and physics that the 1998 discovery of accelerating expansion brought).

And what about the 3 Nobel Prizes awarded to participants in that discovery? Do they have to now be returned.

The fact that the posted article doesn't even mention what a revolution in astronomy they would be effecting if their claim that the acceleration is "could just be an apparent effect" is proved leads me to believe there's not much there here.

I am extremely skeptical. The acceleration was discovered nearly 20 years ago. It was corroborated in 2011 by another mammoth study of millions of galaxies.

And now today it's what? All nothing? Mirage? Never mind?

Color me extremely skeptical. This is the scientific-world's equivalent of click-bait, or grant-bait.

##### kjung6921
5 / 5 (5)13 hours ago
Google this: "No, Astronomers Haven't Decided Dark Energy is Nonexistent"

It's in Scientific American and it answers a previous "reframing" attempted in 2016.
##### ciggenie
1 / 5 (1)13 hours ago
the sun is not an active reactor.

if energy can never leak/vanish into space, why all the fuels we used did not make earth warmer?

if you cut a channel between the ocean and a lake, the water level will be the same. if rained 1 foot into the lake, the water level will be still the same.

if rained 1 inch in the ocean, the lake will be flooded by 1 inch.

the sun's energy/vibrating electrostatic force/radiation stays within the upper atmosphere and moves around the earth. That energy/electrical current stays within the atmosphere and crust and moves westward at 1000 miles per hour at the equator, produces earth magnetic field, causes polar lights.

transforms into matters movement, the wind, clouds, waves, photosynthesis and more.
##### kjung6921
5 / 5 (4)12 hours ago

the sun's energy/vibrating electrostatic force/radiation ... produces earth magnetic field, causes polar lights.

You really don't know that the Earth's magnetic field is produced in the Earth's core? What grade are you in? Your elementary school science teachers should be ashamed of your ignorance.
##### Da Schneib
5 / 5 (2)12 hours ago
Somehow my link to the open access arXiv paper got munged above, and with @Zeph hammering the thread I didn't notice. The correct link is: https://arxiv.org...06.07236
##### ciggenie
1 / 5 (1)12 hours ago
1 electron carries 1 negative charge

if we smash the electron into 1000000 equal pieces, each piece will carry 1/1000000 negative charge. Let's call it enertron.

since enertrons carry the same negative charge, they repel each other.

if we have a perfect bottle, which means no leakage, no react, like glass bottle to air.

we put 1000000 enertrons into the perfect bottle, since enertrons repel each other, they put a pressure on the bottle wall. let's measure and call that pressure 1 volt.

if we put 8000000 enertrons into the same bottle, the pressure on the wall should be 4 volts.

now if 1 enertron is moving or vibrating, the rest all enertrons will be energized.

that is the mechanism of light/quantum.

now if we put 1 positive charge into the perfect bottle, what will happen?
##### ciggenie
1 / 5 (1)12 hours ago
enertrons should be attracted by the positive charge and form a ball around it, the closer to the positive charge the denser enertron cloud. the density of the enertron is decay at 1/rrr due to the repulsion force between enertrons decay at 1/rr.

the enertron cloud is always vibrating, due to the existence of energy, the unbalance attraction force and repulsion force, within the enertron cloud and the center positive charge.

now image enertron is the real thing, it carries a tiny negative charge, something like 1/10^33 electron charge, but it has a stronger force field, similar to neodymium magnet compared with iron magnet.

image proton actually carries 918 positive charges, it attracted 917 total charges of enertrons formed a solid ball, 1 electron attached to the ball to form a neutrally charged hydrogen atom. 1 atomic weight equal to 1936 total charges, no matter positive or negative charges.

this is the realistic atomic structure.
##### Da Schneib
5 / 5 (3)11 hours ago
@kjung, Yes, I read that SciAm post. I am still reading the paper this article is about, and thinking about the objections raised against DE. There is no question whether there is an effect. The sticking point is and always has been that we simply don't know what it is.

The particular study in the current paper proposes that this effect is due to a difference in the way redshift happens in voids as opposed to the way it happens in filaments (the authors talk about "walls," but if you look at the plots they show, it's apparent they have at least some evidence that a large portion of our sky looks into large voids).

Like you I am skeptical; the standard interpretation of GRT says that voids cannot cause a blueshift in light, and mass concentrations cannot cause a redshift, in sufficient quantity to account for the redshift we see. Wiltshire et al. claim they can. The evidence is equivocal at this point (though it leans 99% against the Wiltshire claim).
##### ciggenie
not rated yet11 hours ago
atoms are solid balls, matter is not compressible. such as water.

if atoms are constructed as science told you, why matter is not compressible? electron shell/wave/cloud/orbital are negatively charged, they do not stick to positive changed nuclear is a magic, how can they stand any force/impact/reaction without crashing?

why is energy conserved?

if you push/put a moving force on any enertron with a force f, that force is spreading to all the enertrons in the bottle at light speed, they all are moving now, and cannot stop ever.

do we have a perfect bottle?

yes, every atom is a perfect bottle. all matters are a perfect bottle. energy has nowhere to go but bounce within and between matters.

the forces f=Ke x e1e2/rr and f=G x m1m2/rr are like perfect springs between/within matters, connected all matters in 1.
##### ciggenie
not rated yet11 hours ago

do you really know what is energy? not even einstein.

what is ENERGY?

coal? fuel? oxygen? wind? sunlight? any matters?

NO. matter is not energy. matter is the carrier/source/container of energy.

a rock at rest only has its thermal energy.

if you threw it away, your hand put a force on the rock pushing it moving at a speed v, the moving rock will have 1/2mvv energy added on it. we call it kinetic energy.

if the flying rock hits a wall, that energy becomes the impact force that hits the wall, makes atoms on the wall vibrate faster/hotter, atoms thermal energy.

so, energy is nothing but vibrating force/moving force.

energy is always vibrating/moving, within and between matters. matter is always moving/vibr
##### Da Schneib
5 / 5 (4)11 hours ago
@Zeph so you know I reported one of your posts. I expect you'll be out of here when the mods come back on line.

I don't know why you bother. Did you get kicked off another science site?
##### Da Schneib
5 / 5 (2)11 hours ago
@dnat I saw your posts. I'll try to respond today, work permitting. Short form, all the void proposals are extensions to GRT to try to account for Lambda on the RHS of the EFE despite claims to the contrary. It's OK to claim redshift for entry into the filaments, but to flesh these out these folks pretty much always require non-GRT to introduce blueshifts into voids; that is, really nothing doing something. I am very skeptical.
##### ciggenie
not rated yet11 hours ago
what is time?

if we put the same clock in the sun and the earth for 1 day

the earth clock will read/run 24 hours, the sun clock will read fewer hours.

which clock is correct? what time is correct time?

we use matters movement to measure time, what we measured is the changing of the movement, the reading on the timer.

all matters, all things are constantly moving, never stop.

time is always moving with all things right now.

past and future only exist in our minds.

a living tree can be a timer

a blooming flower can be a timer

but the tree and the flower are not time

nor the readings on the clock

all the time we/the universe/existence have is ever changing now

WHAT WE BECOME IS THE MATTER
##### Hyperfuzzy
not rated yet11 hours ago
what is time?

if we put the same clock in the sun and the earth for 1 day

the earth clock will read/run 24 hours, the sun clock will read fewer hours.

which clock is correct? what time is correct time?

we use matters movement to measure time, what we measured is the changing of the movement, the reading on the timer.

all matters, all things are constantly moving, never stop.

time is always moving with all things right now.

past and future only exist in our minds.

a living tree can be a timer

a blooming flower can be a timer

but the tree and the flower are not time

nor the readings on the clock

all the time we/the universe/existence have is ever changing now

WHAT WE BECOME IS THE MATTER

Prove it, do it!
##### ciggenie
not rated yet11 hours ago
we all going home after the party

where's my home? and yours?

i did my best, tired.
##### Tuxford
1 / 5 (1)10 hours ago
The principle of Occam's Razor favors the model without cosmological acceleration.

And tired light over inter-galactic distances explains it rather simply, as LaViolette has pointed out decades ago. But merger mania is forever. What is the maniac going to do now? Squirm?
##### ciggenie
not rated yet10 hours ago
open your palm dividing above and below

reach your arm defining west and east

point a finger tingling the sun

kiss the moon with soft dreams
##### JongDan
not rated yet10 hours ago
I was also thinking gravity is not a real force, but an emergent effect, just inertia in another form. We'll see.

Dude I hope you're aware that entire general relativity is build upon this idea.
##### ciggenie
not rated yet9 hours ago
the mechanism of electromagnetism is simple, the force f=Ke x e1e2/rr between matters is the carrier of electromagnetism.

there is no field but force between two parallel copper wires at distance r. the repulsion force between electrons on the surface of the two wires. f=Ke x e1e2/rr.

if electrons move/accelerate in one wire, that repulsion force between electrons on the two wires will move/accelerate electrons in the other wire. the mechanism of electromagnetism.

there is no field, only electrostatic force at work.
##### ciggenie
not rated yet9 hours ago
some metals such as iron can be easily magnetized by a coil. because the moving electrostatic force in the coil will spin electrons in the iron atom and make nuclear polarize/off center.

in a transformer, the electrons on the first coil and second coil always move/accelerate in the same direction at the same rate. the electrons move/vibrate in the first coil, the force between the electrons on the wire and the core f=Ke x e1e2/rr accelerate electrons in the core, the energy passes through the core and energize the electrons in the second coil.

the mechanism of electromagnetic induction.

without matters, there is no force. a single matter has no force. force can only exist between matters.

without a test body, where is the electric or magnetic field? where is gravity field?

the mysteries of the universe are within 2 equations.

f=Ke x e1e1/rr and f=G x m1m2/rr.

Those 2 forces rule everything existing.
##### dnatwork
5 / 5 (3)9 hours ago
I was also thinking gravity is not a real force, but an emergent effect, just inertia in another form. We'll see.

Dude I hope you're aware that entire general relativity is build upon this idea.

Odd, others have been telling me that contradicts general relativity.

Wikipedia: Phenomena that in classical mechanics are ascribed to the action of the force of gravity (such as free-fall, orbital motion, and spacecraft trajectories), correspond to inertial motion within a curved geometry of spacetime in general relativity; there is no gravitational force deflecting objects from their natural, straight paths. Instead, gravity corresponds to changes in the properties of space and time, which in turn changes the straightest-possible paths that objects will naturally follow.

Huh, sounds like GRT says gravity is not a force, just an effect of inertia in curved spacetime. Good thing I'm just a guy on the internet, reading press releases about science-y stuff.
##### dnatwork
4.3 / 5 (3)8 hours ago
Okay, then I need to know more before spewing thoughts.

Still thinking dark energy and dark matter look like attempts to pick up the soup after you've dropped the bowl.
##### Hyperfuzzy
not rated yet8 hours ago
Okay, then I need to know more before spewing thoughts.

Still thinking dark energy and dark matter look like attempts to pick up the soup after you've dropped the bowl.

All you need is an MSEE and common sense!
##### Da Schneib
5 / 5 (1)8 hours ago
@dnat, your point that relativists contend that gravity is not a force is well taken; it rather washes the sand out from under their feet. If this is what you meant by your statement I may not have an argument against it, but I don't agree that this is an argument against dark energy, and it certainly isn't an argument against dark matter.

##### ciggenie
not rated yet8 hours ago
what is ENERGY?

coal? fuel? oxygen? any matters?

NO. matter is not energy. matter is the carrier/source/container of energy.

a rock at rest only has its thermal energy.

if you threw it away, your hand put a force on the rock pushing it moving at a speed v, the moving rock will have 1/2mvv energy added on it. we call it kinetic energy.

if the flying rock hits a wall, that energy becomes the impact force that hits the wall, makes atoms on the wall vibrate faster/hotter, atoms thermal energy.

so, energy is nothing but vibrating/moving electrostatic force.

energy is always vibrating/moving, within and between matters. matter is always moving/vibrating due to the existence of energy.

nothing is ever at rest, keep moving, changing, involving, reforming, transforming.

somehow, LIFE woke up?
##### ciggenie
not rated yet7 hours ago
i predict that i will be banned soon. even i am using a new ip. space travel is a hoax. how iss radiate heat into space? where the heat go? finished?

no scientists know what is energy. not einstain. he said he knows shit about what is light quanta. now every dick knows better. there is no photon.

photon travels at light speed, carry electric field and magnetic field at 90 degrees, pass the space between sun and earth to reach us?

total BS. gravity slows down light? why flashlight and sunlight same speed? how gravity bend space and time? space and time have no mass. how gravity interacts with nothing? fk qm and gr or sr. clean your toilet, find you a while hole.
##### ciggenie
not rated yet7 hours ago
light does not propagate in vacuum space, there is no light in vacuum space.

light is electrons vibration force, only exist within matters, only propagate within matters/mediums.

a black hole is impossible

all matters carry light

bigger mass, stronger light.

electrons can only move/vibrate along the plane perpendicular to the radius of the atoms on the surface of matters.

the electrical force/field is oscillating on the plane and the energy is propagating at 90 degrees.

this is all happening within matter/medium.

in the vacuum, the force between electrons on the sun surface and our outer atmosphere surface atoms instantly transfer the energy. pass it through the atmosphere to us.

the transverse wave only exists within matter.

man made em waves are a different story

the electrons vibrate a longer distance in the antenna, at much lower rate.
##### ciggenie
not rated yet7 hours ago
energy is accelerating electrostatic force carried by accelerating matter/charge.

gravity is induced electrostatic force between neutrally charged matters. the force between 2 charged particles f=Ke x pq/rr is the mechanism of quantum entanglement. it works as a perfect rod connected 2 particles in 1. the rod is massless, from f=ma, the energy/moving force is instantly transferred.
##### Whydening Gyre
5 / 5 (1)7 hours ago
@Zeph so you know I reported one of your posts. I expect you'll be out of here when the mods come back on line.

I don't know why you bother. Did you get kicked off another science site?

DS, I don't think cigg is Zeph. Not his writing and posting style.
Neither was the Oxivape one
this one is more like Hyper's Uncle or something.
##### ciggenie
not rated yet5 hours ago
First, you are looking at it all wrong. Space is infinite in time and physical dimension. Charge is infinite from it's center to infinity. The motion of a charge's center produces a wave in its field, no other field affected only another's center may be affected, effected, whatever ... This describes space as it is, not how you are calculating. Light, or a wrinkle in its field ... all that exists. There is no "thing" called mass but a "mass" of these centers!

Get it? These fields are everywhere, there does not exist "Nothing!". So yes, your dark mattter is created by assuming "Nothing" really exist. LOL! So from a distance, how may any wavelet be perceived? Forward, backward? Also from within an atom and within greater and greater numbers ... does attraction always win? Note: These centers only obey the law; there is no law defining any configuration other than the applied field or lack thereof. So each center may occupy the same point in space and time.

5*
##### Benni
not rated yet3 hours ago
this is serious matter, no one gives a fuck? what's wrong with you people?

@ciggenie...........Have you yet met Schneibo? He sometimes goes by Da Schneib. You have become a good match for him when it comes to serial posting, I swear he sometimes becomes out of breath blue from the arduous exercise he puts those fingers through, exhausting stuff talking about nothing or Copy & Pasting other people's stuff.

But hey guy, don't worry, he's been here for a few years posting the same slop & swill over & over again, so you should be OK, I won't give you any ones, I'll just continue reserving those for copycat Schneibo.

Oh, one thing missing if you imagine you want to compete with Schneibo, you need to upgrade your name calling & foul mouthed profanity skills, that would easily tack another 50 points onto your IQ, Schneibo learned that shortcut almost right off the bat, he gets up to grade school level of science from time to time.
##### ciggenie
not rated yet3 hours ago
if you can debunk any of my claims, why hastate?

live and learn, be well.

eyes are watching, not all retarded.
##### ciggenie
not rated yet3 hours ago
shameless scientists cannot explain how atoms are formed.

they invented orbital model/bohr, improved it to the standard model, made up quantum mechanics.

push uncertainty principle, wave-particle duality, black holes, tbb, relativity, time travel, simulation, space travel.

will, every dog has its day.

fake science is the next.
##### ciggenie
not rated yet2 hours ago
what a joke.

readers must be wondering what is going on? where are scientists?

no one defends their science?
##### ciggenie
not rated yet2 hours ago
or they are honest?

they cannot debunk anything!

you be the judge. you are a Wiseman.
##### Hyperfuzzy
not rated yet2 hours ago
As we mumble and seek approval of what is published due to [ Publish or perish ] does not define truth! Truth is, wither you believe it, can explain it, understand it, it is!

So, kudos to those who observe! Then ...
##### ciggenie
not rated yet2 hours ago
As we mumble and seek approval of what is published due to [ Publish or perish ] does not define truth! Truth is, wither you believe it, can explain it, understand it, it is!

So, kudos to those who observe! Then ...

Kudos! Well stated.
##### Maggnus
not rated yet2 hours ago
@ciggenie...........Have you yet met Schneibo? He sometimes goes by Da Schneib. You have become a good match for him when it comes to serial posting, I swear he sometimes becomes out of breath blue from the arduous exercise he puts those fingers through, exhausting stuff talking about nothing or Copy & Pasting other people's stuff.

But hey guy, don't worry, he's been here for a few years posting the same slop & swill over & over again, so you should be OK, I won't give you any ones, I'll just continue reserving those for copycat Schneibo.

Oh, one thing missing if you imagine you want to compete with Schneibo, you need to upgrade your name calling & foul mouthed profanity skills, that would easily tack another 50 points onto your IQ, Schneibo learned that shortcut almost right off the bat, he gets up to grade school level of science from time to time.

I removed yu from ignore this one time to say this:

You are a fucking moron.
##### ciggenie
not rated yet1 hour ago
there is no aether, no photon, no quanta.

the repulsion force between electrons on the surface atoms between the line of sight matters, f=Ke x e1e2/rr is the carrier of light/em waves/information.

the hot plasmas on the sun vibrate and the repulsion force between those vibrating electrons and the outer atmosphere electrons carry that energy/vibrating electrostatic force instantly, that energy pass through the air atoms at light speed and act like a wave.

if we have infinite eyesight, we can see the whole universe at the same time, there is no past, no future. but forever changing.

energy and matter are both immortal, i wonder about life.
##### ciggenie
not rated yet1 hour ago

einstein was wrong about everything in science.

relativity is bs. we can never move at light speed to observe anything.

the photoelectric effect is bs. light waves in the air act on the cell as fiction, make electrons on the surface atoms vibrating. if the vibration force is stronger than attraction force from the nuclear, electrons will escape from atoms.

e=mcc is bs. mass m, not matter gold or silver. has no energy.

accelerate it to speed c, it carries 1/2 mcc kinetic energy.

how to accelerate a mass to 1.414 c speed to get mcc energy?

what kind of matter/mass carries mcc energy?

gravity is attraction force between masses. f=G x m1m2/rr.

gravity has nothing to do with space and time.
##### ciggenie
not rated yet24 minutes ago
Apology for been rude, flooded my comments here. I have no one to talk science, banned everywhere.

Had the chance to share my science concepts with you, I became a crybaby. Shame on me!

1 / 5 (1)53 minutes ago
Apology for been rude, flooded my comments here. I have no one to talk science, banned everywhere.

Had the chance to share my science concepts with you, I became a crybaby. Shame on me!
##### Ojorf
not rated yet14 minutes ago
Finally!
Something I agree with.

Anyway, about the article, I'm also somewhat skeptical, will have to see how it pans out.
Just a point, if this study is correct, it does not mean the universe is NOT expanding, it means expansion is not accelerating.
Expansion due to BB & inflation still applies.